• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
  • Recommended: 'Why would we wait?': 3 sisters face Jolie's cancer dilemma
  • Recommended: Chorus of critics greets new psychiatric manual release
  • Recommended: New SARS cousin finally has a name : MERS
  • Recommended: Attention deficit leads US kids' mental health problems, CDC reports

One body. One mind. That's what each of us gets to last a lifetime. Get the critical news and views to keep yours healthy, sharp -- and safe.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • Advertise | AdChoices
    28
    Jan
    2013
    3:11pm, EST

    Dog treat made from bull penis may pose health risks

    By LiveScience Staff

    When dog owners toss their canine companions a bully stick to chew on, they might not be aware that the popular treat could be packed with calories and contaminated with bacteria, researchers say. And pet owners might not even know that the stick is made from an uncooked, dried bull penis.

    In a small study, researchers examined a sample of 26 bully sticks, also known as pizzle sticks, manufactured in the United States and Canada. They found that the treats contained 9 to 22 calories per inch. That means the average 6-inch bully stick potentially represents 9 percent of the recommended daily calorie count for a larger 50-pound (22-kilogram) dog and 30 percent of the requirements for a smaller 10-pound (4.5-kg) dog — a significant source of calories pet owners might not be aware of.

    "With obesity in pets on the rise, it is important for pet owners to factor in not only their dog's food, but also treats and table food," researcher Lisa Freeman, a professor of nutrition at Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, said in a statement.

    Tests for bacteria showed that one of the treats contained Clostridium difficile, one was contaminated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA ), and seven contained E. coli. The researchers noted that their sample was small and a more extensive study is needed to investigate the widespread contamination rate in bully sticks. But they said their results at least suggest pet owners should wash their hands after touching such treats, as they would with any raw meat.

    (This isn't the first time a pet treat has been linked with contamination. Researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in 2010 in the journal Pediatrics that an outbreak of salmonella in 79 people between 2006 and 2008 was caused by contaminated dry pet food.)

    While the source of the bully sticks is no secret, many pet owners don't seem to be aware that the treats are made from the raw penises of bulls or steers, a survey by the research team showed. A 20-question online poll completed by 852 dog owners from 44 states and six countries showed that 44 percent of respondents could correctly identify the source of bully sticks as bull penises. (Twenty-three percent said they fed their dogs the treats.) And there was even some confusion among veterinarians — an unimpressive majority of vets (62 percent) polled by the researchers knew where bully sticks came from.

    "We were surprised at the clear misconceptions pet owners and veterinarians have with pet foods and many of the popular raw animal-product based pet treats currently on the market," said Freeman in a statement. "For example, 71 percent of people feeding bully sticks to their pets stated they avoid by-products in pet foods, yet bully sticks are, for all intents and purposes, an animal by-product."

    The research is detailed in this month's issue of the Canadian Veterinary Journal.

    More from LiveScience:

    • 10 Things You Didn't Know About Dogs
    • Like Dog, Like Owner: What Breeds Say About Personality
    • In Photos: America's Favorite Pets 

    8 comments

    Show more
    Explore related topics: pet-health, dog-treats
  • 9
    Jan
    2013
    2:47pm, EST

    Firms withdraw chicken jerky pet treats over antibiotics

    By JoNel Aleccia, Senior Writer, NBC News

    Two of the nation’s top retailers of chicken jerky dog treats are voluntarily withdrawing several popular brands after New York state agriculture officials said they may be contaminated with unapproved antibiotics.

    Nestle Purina PetCare Co. officials announced Wednesday that they’re withdrawing Waggin’ Train and Canyon Creek Ranch brand dog treats until further notice. Officials at Milo’s Kitchen, which is owned by the Del Monte Corp. of San Francisco, announced they are voluntarily recalling the firm's Chicken Jerky and Chicken Grillers home-style dog treats from shelves nationwide.

    The move came after the New York Department of Agriculture and Marketing told federal Food and Drug Administration veterinary officials this week that trace amounts of residual poultry antibiotics had been found in several lots of each of the brands of jerky treat products.

    The agriculture agency found very low levels of four antibiotics that are not approved for use in poultry in the U.S. and one antibiotic that is approved for U.S. poultry use, but is limited to nearly undetectable levels in the finished product, said Joe Morrissey, a department spokesman. The antibiotics include sulfaclozine, tilmicosin, trimethoprim, enrofloxacin and sulfaquinoxaline, he said.

    The antibiotics are approved in China, where most of the treats are made, and in other countries, according to company statements. 

    However, Keith Schopp, a spokesman for St. Louis-based Nestle Purina, said that the issue is not related to the ongoing FDA investigation of problems with Chinese-made jerky pet treats that may have sickened more than 2,200 pets and killed 360 dogs and one cat, according to consumer reports.

    "There is no indication that the trace amounts of antibiotic residue is related to FDA's ongoing investigation," Schopp told NBC News. 

    "Due to regulatory inconsistencies among countries, the presence of antibiotic residue is technically considered an adulteration in the United States," Schopp added.

    FDA officials said they were confident that the detection of antibiotics "do not raise health concerns," and that they are "highly unlikely" to be related to the reports of pet illness linked to jerky treats that date back to 2007, according to a statement published late Wednesday.

    FDA has conducted extensive testing and said it could find no toxins or other contaminants responsible for causing alleged illnesses ranging from nausea and vomiting to kidney failure and death. Officials said that the New York agriculture agency used a new, particularly sensitive test to detect the antibiotics. Morrissey said food specialists there tested the jerky treats because of "growing consumer concerns."

    FDA officials reminded pet owners that jerky treats are not a necessary part of any animal's diet.

    Robin Pierre, a New York pet owner, blames Waggin' Train chicken jerky treats for the sudden death of Bella, her 2-year-old pug in 2011. Pierre, who launched a petition urging companies to recall the treats, said she was pleased at the new move, but sorry that the FDA didn't act sooner.

    "How many lives could have been saved if, six years ago, when there was first doubt that the safety of our companions was compromised, the FDA and all manufacturers of imported chicken jerky had issued a precautionary recall until the toxin was found?" she said in a statement to NBC News. "How much pain and suffering could have been avoided if only they had met their moral obligation six years ago and did the job the taxpayers pay them to do?"

    Related stories:  

    • 3 big brands may be tied to chicken jerky illness in dogs FDA records show
    • China stiff-arms FDA on chicken jerky pet treat testing, records show
    • Grieving pet owners take jerky treat fight to the stores

    98 comments

    Show more
    Explore related topics: featured, pet-health, dog-treats, jerky-treats

Browse

  • featured,
  • cdc,
  • fda,
  • cancer,
  • food-safety,
  • fungal-meningitis,
  • salmonella,
  • childrens-health,
  • health-care,
  • womens-health,
  • health,
  • obesity,
  • mental-health,
  • hiv,
  • aids,
  • pregnancy,
  • bird-flu,
  • heart-health,
  • sexual-health,
  • necc,
  • aging,
  • flu,
  • breast-cancer,
  • behavior,
  • alzheimers,
  • diabetes,
  • vaccines,
  • smoking,
  • birth-control,
  • recall,
  • meningitis,
  • autism,
  • health-insurance,
  • influenza,
  • obamacare,
  • heart-disease,
  • children,
  • h7n9,
  • mens-health,
  • china,
  • psychology,
  • whooping-cough
Also

Top NBCNews.com headlines

3147,10
Advertise | AdChoices

JoNel Aleccia, Senior Writer, NBC News

JoNel Aleccia is an award-winning national health reporter at NBC News. She has spent more than 25 years covering health, food safety, education and social issues for newspaper and online readers.

JoNel Aleccia, Senior Writer, NBC News Blogroll

  • Superbug - Wired Science
  • Follow me on Twitter

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (83)
    • April (127)
    • March (126)
    • February (107)
    • January (111)
  • 2012
    • December (92)
    • November (131)
    • October (171)
    • September (110)
    • August (90)
    • July (94)
    • June (67)
    • May (91)
    • April (89)
    • March (87)
    • February (66)
    • January (62)
  • 2011
    • December (64)
    • November (50)
    • October (63)

Most Commented

  • Pediatricians take on gun lobby – carefully (1503)
  • More women opting for preventive mastectomy - but should they be? (612)
  • No. 1 swimming pool problem? It's number two! (338)
  • Angelina Jolie: I had double mastectomy because of high breast cancer risk (375)
  • Doctors doubt nurses skills, survey finds (483)
  • UN urges: Eat more insects! (Seriously) (138)
  • Couple sues over adopted son's sex-assignment surgery (168)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • US News
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Health on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise