US birth rate hits a record low

By LiveScience Staff

The rate of babies born in the United States hit a record low in 2011, a new analysis shows. Researchers say the drastic drop in the birth rate among immigrants has greatly contributed to the overall decrease.

Based on preliminary data from the National Center for Health Statistics, the Pew Research Center calculated that the overall birth rate — the annual number of births per 1,000 women between 15 to 44 — was 63.2 last year. That's the lowest since such reliable record collection began in 1920 and close to half the birth rate in 1957, amid the Baby Boom years.

The overall number of births declined 7 percent from 2007 to 2010. During this period, U.S.-born women saw a 5 percent birth-rate decline, while there was a 13 percent drop in births to immigrants. The drop was even more dramatic for Mexican immigrant women, at 23 percent.

Despite the recent dip, foreign-born mothers still give birth to a disproportionate share of the nation's newborns, a trend that has persisted over the past two decades. The birth rate for immigrant women in 2010 was 87.8 per 1,000 births, compared with 58.9 per 1,000 births for American-born women. And although only 13 percent of the U.S. population was foreign-born in 2010, immigrant births accounted for 23 percent of all newborns that year, according to the Pew Research Center.

The report also found that the share of births to unmarried mothers and teen mothers was higher for U.S.-born women (42 percent and 11 percent, respectively in 2010) than to foreign-born women (36 percent and 5 percent, respectively). Meanwhile, a higher share of immigrant women gave birth at age 35 and older (21 percent) than did U.S.-born women in that age set (13 percent).

Overall U.S. teen birth rates have declined about 37 percent in the past two decades, according a report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released in April 2011. That study found contraceptive use is lowest, while teen childbirth is highest, among Hispanics and non-Hispanic blacks. Lower contraceptive use may also explain why teens in states with more residents with conservative religious beliefs are also more likely than other teens to give birth. That study, detailed in the journal Reproductive Health in 2009, found that Mississippi topped the list of conservative religious beliefs and teen birth rates.

Researchers with Pew say the cause of the immigrant birth-rate decline, found in the new study, is likely due to changes in behavior, since the composition of immigrants in the U.S. population has not changed during that time period. A previous report from Pew tied the recent overall birth-rate decline to the recession. Latinos — who make up a large portion of the immigrant population — have been hit particularly hard by the economic downturn, with increasing poverty and unemployment rates.

Pew researchers said their projections show that by 2050, immigrants arriving since 2005 and their descendants will account for 82 percent of U.S. population growth.

More from LiveScience:

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

The bottom line is we have too many kids. We can't take care of the ones we have. That includes feeding them, educating them well, teaching them good behavior, keeping them off drugs, and teaching them how to take good care of their bodies.

We have thousands of kids who need good homes. If all of the people who want to stop abortions would just adopt the kids who need homes, we would be a better nation.

Everyone just take a break from having kids for awhile. Go to Petco or PetsSmart or the pound and adopt a puppy or kitten if you want something cute in your lives that will give you unconditional love. That's why so many people have kids. You can have wonderfully meaningful, full lives without children. It's amazing how that works...

  • 18 votes
#1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:08 PM EST

I think you missed the point...people like to f*ck. When contraception is available, this predilection doesn't result in unwanted childbirth. Religious conservatives are in a Victorian state of denial over the nature of human sexuality, and are thus the most likely candidate for unwanted, excessive, and needless childbirth.

  • 23 votes
#1.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:41 PM EST

Intelligent... - Everyone just take a break from having kids for awhile.

I would seriously suggest that, for the sake of the planet's dwindling resources, all nations of the world put a moratorium on human births for 30 years, most especially China, in order that future generations have a place to live when they get here. We are killing our only home. But this article is good news, at least for the U.S. I'm surprised to read this, and hope they know what they're talking about.

Now, what is there to be done about people like the Duggers who have...is it 20 kids now? Outrageous!

  • 18 votes
#1.3 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:00 PM EST

Or better yet, make it 50 years...that will solve the population problem good!

  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:01 PM EST

Birth rates are the true health of a nation. If the birth rate is low, then the nation is in poor shape. In fact our entire economy and taxation system, especially in terms on Social Security is predicated on birth rates either staying the same or increasing. This nation was at it's peak in the late 40's, 50's and 60's when birth rates were high. When birthrates drop, in 20-30 years time the taxes aren't there to support the previous generation in terms of retirement or to even maintain what they built. We have to continue to grow and expand otherwise we shrink. Every empire that has every existed, as soon as it stopped growing and expanding it fell into decline. We are at that point now. Make your choice.

This idea of not being able to feed, clothe and educated children because of the bad economy or whatever is completely erroneous. This nation has been in far worse conditions both at it's beginning, in the Civil War, in the Great Depression and in WWII than it is now. Children grew up fine. In fact some would say better than kids are now. Frankly I think children are spoiled. A little hardship would do them some good. It is through trial where you determine someone's or a nation's true character.

  • 6 votes
#1.5 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:08 PM EST

GBR COMPLETELY wrong. It's well established that developed nations have LOWER birth rates. There are many reasons for this, including that offspring do not die off so easily (so you don't need six kids).

Basic research will show you that lower birth rates point to a SUCCESSFUL society.

  • 26 votes
#1.6 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:11 PM EST

GBR - We have to continue to grow and expand otherwise we shrink.

I completely disagree with your comments. To where do you suggest we expand? Humanity has already peopled all the continents of the world, and is using up resources faster than the Earth can replenish them. The planet is gravely struggling to support seven billion people, heading rapidly toward the ten billion mark. We're killing the finite resources of this planet, without which we cannot survive. Can't you see this?

  • 16 votes
#1.7 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:38 PM EST

The bottom line is we have too many kids. We can't take care of the ones we have.

That is fear (lack of faith), not intelligence.

As a person who has experienced unemployment and under-employment, every time I think everything is about to cave in God provides.

  • 2 votes
#1.8 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:46 PM EST

DB - every time I think everything is about to cave in God provides.

That's nice for you, but what about personal responsibility?

  • 10 votes
#1.9 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:03 PM EST

Sorry, but its not that easy to adopt. And many children you think are "orphans", actually do have living family who eventually want them back.

Also, comparing children to puppies or kittens is just wrong. Children are human beings, and adopting a dog or cat won't satisfy someone's desire for a child.

  • 5 votes
#1.10 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:09 PM EST

I completely disagree with your comments. To where do you suggest we expand? Humanity has already peopled all the continents of the world, and is using up resources faster than the Earth can replenish them. The planet is gravely struggling to support seven billion people, heading rapidly toward the ten billion mark. We're killing the finite resources of this planet, without which we cannot survive. Can't you see this?

Well I wasn't particularly talking about humanity as a whole but more particularly about the U.S. However, humanity could expand off the planet if we actually put our minds to it.

    #1.11 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:12 PM EST

    JMartina - ...adopting a dog or cat won't satisfy someone's desire for a child.

    So? Why do you think a desire to have a child should automatically be fulfilled? That 'child' very rapidly grows up to be an adult, no longer cute and cuddly, and needs food, water, housing, clothing, etc. etc., resources that are being used up. At this point in time, replacing more than yourself is selfish.

    • 9 votes
    #1.12 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:21 PM EST

    GBR COMPLETELY wrong. It's well established that developed nations have LOWER birth rates. There are many reasons for this, including that offspring do not die off so easily (so you don't need six kids).

    Basic research will show you that lower birth rates point to a SUCCESSFUL society.

    Yes and those weak kids that don't die off because they are saved by the health care system, breed and create more weakness. Then large amounts of genetic disease start popping up and the welfare system has to take care of them and we all have to prop it up. Then in a few decades after excessive spending and widespread corruption, we have massive austerity cuts, our economy falters and the nation goes into the tank. Then we start all over, have high birth rates again, rinse and repeat. And so every great empire dies.

    Didn't you pay attention to Darwinian theory in science class? It applies to nations as well as ecosystems and organisms.

    • 3 votes
    #1.13 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:24 PM EST

    Maybe enough people have had it with the dying concept the American dream which is being taken away by the huge transference of wealth over the past 30 years. Why bring more people into a society where you can be a disposable pawn or cannon fodder for a system that doesn't represent your interests anymore ?

    Thanks Reagan for destroying life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for the many, may you burn ever so brightly in the hottest part of hell.

    • 6 votes
    #1.14 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:58 PM EST

    When contraception is available, this predilection doesn't result in unwanted childbirth.

    According to the Centers for Disease Control  (CDC), since 1973, roughly 50 million legal induced abortions have been performed in the United States

      #1.15 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:05 AM EST

      And JUST why do you expansionist dweebs think Mother Nature Put killer pandemics on this planet for, such as the black plague and, more recently, the spanish flu 1917-1918 when Earths atmosphers was LADEN with Killer flu virus destroying 70,000,000 PeopleTHEN. WHO and CDC Scientists are worried as a new and Certainly MORE DEADLY Pandemic is due what with H1N1, very Contagious swine Flu and H5N1, 70% Kill Rate Bird Flu and Worse Yet 95% Kill Rate Ebola which is here as the tame Reston Ebola in Virginia, But killed 5 People in Quick order at Yosemite, Ca. Why do you think All the Drug stores Are Pushing getting a combination flu shot Now? It ain't over 'till MomNature Sings Her Song...

      • 2 votes
      #1.16 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:40 AM EST


      Yes and those weak kids that don't die off because they are saved by the health care system, breed and create more weakness. Then large amounts of genetic disease start popping up and the welfare system has to take care of them and we all have to prop it up.

      One good thing about Nazis is they tend to self-identify rather quickly.

      Didn't you pay attention to Darwinian theory in science class? It applies to nations as well as ecosystems and organisms.

      I think it's time for you to stop typing.

      • 3 votes
      #1.17 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:46 AM EST

      Was AIDS created as another attempt by governments to limit population control like the Syphilis situation that occurred in America?

      What other control measures are used to control population growth???

      One intangible way is the issuance of the CHILD SUPPORT LAW..

      "LET'S INCRIMINATE BROWN PEOPLE FOR HAVING BABIES....""

      CHild support Laws are a watered down way to prevent Brown people from having children that they rightfully deserve to have.
      The "Social Model in America" is to keep Brown men out of work by not hiring them and allowing for this to be the main reason for incarceration to prevent them from having more children.

      the government has already used methods like having secret syphilis programs and providing other disease to this community around the world in order to prevent their population from growing.

      Now all of a sudden all of these new diseases are appearing from out of the blue during the height of the Age of Biotechnology.

      I know for a fact that this was their intent starting many years ago and we want to know about all of the secret programs going on in this country and abroad that targets controlling the population of brown people in America and Africa.

      "CHILD SUPPORT LAWS SHOULD BE ATTACKED WITH VENGEANCE"

      Why????

      No one should be imprisoned for having children.

      Those who are being targeted never had a say in this situation and never signed into a contract to behave in the way that this law is written.

      This is now a $500 Billion dollar industry that prays on BLACK & HISPANIC MEN in AMERICA and seeks to turn them into criminals although they do all in their power to be good dads.

      We will peeellll away at layers of this law until it is based on individual situations that does not look to incriminate men for doing and being what is natural.
      DADS....

      As far as the population control programs that are still in play we will hunt you down and have our revenge on those who seek to cause harm to innocent civilians through use of placing bio engineered diseases within various populations.

      This will occur in this life or my next, mark my word!!!!!

      PEEL LAYER..

      Why won't African countries allow for bio engineered foods to enter their countries????

      Also because the Secret AIDS program that occurred in Africa...

      Because of the reasons listed above and because they know about the secret programs that were done previously and the intent of these other governments....

      • 1 vote
      #1.18 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:06 AM EST

      Speechless @ Peel....... LMAO. Nobody gets put in jail for having babies, you get put in jail for not supporting them and making the rest of us do it for you....

      "what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

      • 2 votes
      #1.19 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:49 AM EST

      Sorry UNC but this law is going to be attacked from soo... many angles that you won't just be"LYAO"

      You are going to begin to open that little tiny brain of yours in order to think of the details of this argument.

      I'm sure you are not a brown or mexican individual who has experienced the hatred that has been experienced by these groups.
      Of course you will say this in order to protect the CHILD support industry. My passion is to take care of mine but, when you go into the court houses ran by this industry all you see are my people going to jail.

      Take the rose colored glasses off and go and view some af the things that are actually occurring meaning that they are indeed FACTS....

      You don't have to believe or even conceive any of this information.
      But, my words are in an effort to prevent my people and other innocent individuals from being bullied by those in this industry.

      You actually sound like you work for one of the courts or are receiving income to help lock up brown individuals for the corporate prison industry in this country.

      The social model imposed on our people will get torn down and we will show that people like you and those alike aka "THE Republicans" don't have the intelligence to rule over our people.

      QUESTION: what part of anything that I mentioned is not true????

      Apparently all of it is true because your little lame comment only consisted of....

      "YOU DON"T GO TO JAIL FOR HAVING BABIES"
      You can't even provide any facts to debunk what i posted...
      LOL...

      I can make a documentary about how courts only go after minorities....
      "take a camera to court and on all floors there are 98% blacks and Mexicans...""
      The Proof Is In The Facts"

      How about this....

      SHAAAT UPP!!!!!!!

      HHmmmm...

      I just peeled his cap....

      PLAYA....

        #1.20 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:31 PM EST

        This is not good news. Add to the low birthdate the millions of people in jail and disenfranchised by the justice system, the millions of people who've been deported along with the hundreds of thousands of their loved ones who followed and may decide not to come back, the millions of people whose minimum wage is so low they can hardly step outside their homes to do anything, the millions of unemployed and underunemployed, and it's easy to see how the US is depriving itself of a badly needed market that can participate and invest in the economy.
        How I wish I could turned the clock back to the 90's.

        • 1 vote
        #1.21 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 11:52 AM EST

        GBR - We have to continue to grow and expand otherwise we shrink.

        Sounds to me like a pyramid scheme.

        Nothing can grow forever... even a super nova will eventually collapse ino a black hole...

        • 2 votes
        #1.22 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 3:57 PM EST

        NortheastVick wrote:

        I just had a daughter in November. Her roots proudly go back to colonial days, and has famous descendants you have all heard of.

        Wow! Your less-than-one-month daughter already has descendants?! Talk about a rapidly declining age of puberty.

        You're exactly the kind of rocket scientist (sarcasm) who should not be breeding!

        • 2 votes
        #1.23 - Mon Dec 3, 2012 9:23 AM EST
        Reply

        Finally some good news! People need to raise the ones they have, properly, before popping out any more.

        • 17 votes
        Reply#2 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:42 PM EST

        OK here's the bad news. There won't ever be enough new people to pay for Social Security and Medicare in the future. The steep decline in birth rates is a hint of what's to come for next generation seniors . And it's not good.

        • 8 votes
        Reply#3 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:42 PM EST

        We've got to stop thinking about exponential growth forever. The planet is maxed out. Time for a different approach, like how do we sustain the people we have.

        • 21 votes
        #3.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:49 PM EST

        RUMMYTub hints at a serious problem.... Since those are alive live longer a decline in birth rates will cause a shrinkage in GDP.. Not enough YOUNG people in the work force.. Some of you guys don't understand that it is a real problem that can't be fixed quickly. If this trend continues this is what we have to look forward to:

        In the last few decades, Japan’s social security budget has soared 15 percent, an increase of 1 trillion yen per year. 50 years ago, there were a dozen workers for every social security retiree. 50 years from now, there will just be one.

        Complicating the issue, is Japan’s dismal birthrate. Young workers have increasingly become reluctant to start families, because of financial concerns. Women are putting off marriage altogether, worried it could tie down their careers. On average, Japanese women have 1.4 children. That number is 1.9 for U.S. women, according to the CDC.

        http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/01/japans-population-to-shrink-nearly-a-third-by-2060/

        The article we all are commenting on stated our birth rate has decreased from the 1.9 figure.. God help us. Our Nation is suffering a slow painful death and here on the vine.. you guys are cheering it on..

        • 5 votes
        #3.2 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:10 PM EST

        *****************Change Is What Life In The Universe Is ALL ABOUT*****************************

        Nations Come and People Go..................................

          #3.3 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:52 AM EST

          Japan has some of the MOST restrictive immigration laws. If your great great grandfather was Korean and you yourself have never set foot in Korea or even speak the language you still are not allowed to be a Japanese citizen. Japan got and is getting what it deserved.

          American will never suffer this fate because when we need fresh blood we can swing open the immigration door and many people continue to slip in the backdoor as it is right now as you yourself well know. Japan, being an island, is harder for Philippians and Malaysians to sneak into than for south americans to slip into the USA. Even in decline American still can draw forth some of the brightest and best minds from developing countries.

            #3.4 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:41 AM EST

            We need to correct Amendment 14 and than enforce our immigration laws of course that won't fix everything but it is a step forward. We need to do something to stop all these citizen babies and the families that follow them to the US and it makes no difference what country they come from. We need to start taking care of our country as it is in deep trouble. We can't keep supporting these people who back door the immigration laws. Just my opinion.

            • 2 votes
            #3.5 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:48 AM EST

            What we need is perestroika (restructuring)!!! In another article about a FBI raid on a Detroit library, people were commenting that Detroit was turning some areas back into farmland due to the decline and shrinkage of the city. Therefore, people could look forward to being able to feed themselves by growing their own food instead of depending on government assistance to buy and import food produced by someone else. Laws would have to be changed to be able to raise farm animals such as chickens in the city for extremely cheap eggs and food closer than a grocery store. Furthermore, if people could overcome their idiocy which might be the biggest obstacle to progress, we could have robots assisting and taking care of us instead of an over abundance of humans.

              #3.6 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 4:53 PM EST
              Reply
              MAR22342Deleted

              The drop was even more dramatic for Mexican immigrant women, at 23 percent.

              I guess anchor babies aren't as attractive as they used to be. Good outcome from the recession.

              • 15 votes
              Reply#5 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:47 PM EST

              The same sad thuggish attitude nativists have been using since the turn of the 20th century. Irish, Italians, Poles, Jews, Chinese...it's all the same bigotry with the targeting recalibrated for the latest wave of immigration.

              • 3 votes
              #5.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:49 PM EST

              At least those immigrants learned English.

              • 14 votes
              #5.2 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:55 PM EST

              Doomsy- Immigrants from Mexico learn English at the same rate as previous immigrants. It will be OK.

              • 2 votes
              #5.3 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:34 AM EST

              My great grandma spoke German til she died. My grandma went on welfare briefly to save her family when my grandpa was in an eventually terminal workplace accident. My family are counter-examples to most of the Wingnuts stereotypes.

                #5.4 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 3:08 PM EST
                Reply

                Intelligent & Independent "If all of the people who want to stop abortions would just adopt the kids who need homes, we would be a better nation."

                If all the people who want recreational sex would have a little self-control, we would be a nation of better people.

                • 6 votes
                Reply#6 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:49 PM EST

                They have self control, in the form of contraception. It's amazing, don't you think, in states where this is available and education begins fairly early, that it works so well, and it's only in the knuckledragging core of the Bible Belt that this is such a problem?

                Denial isn't self control, it's repression. Proper support and management of one's behaviour is far more effective.

                • 12 votes
                #6.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:01 PM EST

                What is "recreational" sex? When a trapeeze is used in the bedroom? Stop having "work" sex and everyone will be much happier........

                • 4 votes
                #6.2 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:01 PM EST

                So sex is only for making babies? Nothing to do with maintaining healthy marriages? If men don't get sex in their marriage or relationship, they will find it elsewhere - whether it be a prostitute, an affair, or in some unfortunate cases, an animal.

                • 4 votes
                #6.3 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:15 PM EST

                Or with inanimate objects.

                  #6.4 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:52 AM EST

                  Only immature, immoral, irresponsible, infantile men pursue sex outside the marriage. Far fewer women who don't get sex inside the marriage pursue it outside of marriage. Someone who cannot control their physical impulses cannot call himself an adult - or a real man or woman.

                  • 2 votes
                  #6.5 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:20 PM EST

                  @GK - Naive alert!!!!

                  Tons of people go outside the marriage because, let's face it, getting laid is fun.

                  I wouldn't call them any of those names except maybe to say that they were opportunists. Marriage is a dead institution which is why about half the time it never lasts. Probably more though really. If it makes you sleep better at night to think people take it seriously, keep thinking that. Most people will cheat and some will get caught. I'd say more often than not they'll get away with it. In my experience women cheat more. Quite often actually. They tend to be more sly about it as well.

                  Unisex advice: At the end of the day, don't pour a lot of yourself into a marriage because likely there is another (or others) pouring themselves into the other half... lol

                  • 1 vote
                  #6.6 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:49 PM EST
                  Reply

                  This is cool

                    Reply#7 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:10 PM EST

                    That rate doesn't make sense NBC..' 87.8 per 1,000 births, compared with 58.9 per 1,000 births '. Who accounts for the other 900 births, aliens from Mars ? LOL.

                    I believe you should say people instead of births there, 87.8 per 1000 people...

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#8 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:23 PM EST

                    The world is overpopulated so this is good news. I hope the trend spreads to all parts of the world. The planet is not going to get bigger or suddenly develop more natural resources just because we want more young people on it to support us in our old age.

                    • 5 votes
                    Reply#9 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:26 PM EST

                    i get the point that the world is over populated. but the lower the birth rate the faster a country dies.....just saying

                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#10 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:29 PM EST

                    so you would rather have the world die from overpopulation where no one would exist?

                    • 1 vote
                    #10.1 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:45 PM EST
                    Reply

                    So where do women like 'Octomom' figure into all of this? How did she happen?

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#11 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:36 PM EST

                    She's called outlying data. She happened with fertilization drugs and semen.

                      #11.1 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:52 PM EST

                      outlying data? well there's a polite term for her.

                        #11.2 - Mon Dec 3, 2012 5:06 PM EST
                        Reply

                        Perhaps there is a correlation between the birth rate and the abortion (infanticide) rate. What do you think.

                        P.S. ms. Fuke, Sex is not a recreational activity.

                          Reply#12 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:51 PM EST

                          There has also been a significant drop in the abortion rate.

                          • 5 votes
                          #12.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:59 PM EST

                          Sex isn't a recreational activity, but the glue that maintains marriage and other committed relationships. Pregnancy is not 100% preventable in those contexts. So your choice is, a sexless marriage that WILL fail... or the unfortunate option that abortion could be necessary as a result of that 1-3% typical risk of contraceptive failure.

                          • 1 vote
                          #12.2 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:12 PM EST

                          "Sex is not a recreational activity"? Beg pardon. I'm post-menopausal. Does that mean I can't ever have sex again? No sex for men with vasectomies? Women with tubal ligations? How about people who are sterile? No sex for them either? No sex for gays? The elderly?

                          Only young, fertile heterosexual couples can have sex and only for the purpose of procreation, is that it? "Honey, are you ovulating? We can't have sex unless you're ovulating!"

                          Think about that statement: "Sex is not a recreational activity." Bullfeathers!

                          • 13 votes
                          #12.3 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:17 PM EST

                          P.S. ms. Fuke, Sex is not a recreational activity.

                          Maybe not how you do it. Everyone else has a blast. Should come over to the other side once, the water's nice.

                            #12.4 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:54 PM EST
                            Reply

                            Don't look to the US to solve the world's overpopulation problem like everyone seems to do when it comes to natural disasters, aid relief, or environmental sanctions. Somehow we're supposed to stay out of everyone's business but at the same time control the outcome?

                            Right now my age group is suffering high unemployment with little chance of gov't protected retirement. My kids won't have it better, they will have it worse. If we should refrain from having kids, it shouldn't be for the well being of an ungrateful and oblivious world, but for the sake of mercy for the innocent. Meanwhile, another rape in the 3rd world results in another child...

                            • 4 votes
                            Reply#13 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:04 PM EST

                            True, the USA cannot solve the problems of the rest of the world. The USA should not be expected to take care of everyone else. Some of these countries need to start solving their own problems.

                            • 3 votes
                            #13.1 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:10 PM EST
                            Reply

                            Some lovely bigotry at work in the studies and in the comments on this thread...

                            Mississippi is also one of the poorest states in the country, I'm sure that has absolutely nothing to do with it!

                            Also, people do get pregnant in spite of using contraceptives -- sometimes more than one method.

                            If we're in such denial, why do we have to keep reminding people that sex has a remarkable tendency to lead to small, dependent human beings and have them act as if *we're* the crazy ones? What about the people who read this article and obviously didn't learn a da*n thing from it, choosing instead to remain stuck in their Ehrlichian Population Bomb doomsday menality (not to mention showing thinly-veiled bigotry toward the 'less-enlightened').

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#14 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:22 PM EST

                            This is good news. There may be hope for us yet.

                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#15 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:44 PM EST

                            I live in Mississippi and one of the reasons for such a high teenage pregnancy rate is the lack of proper sex education in our schools.

                            • 7 votes
                            Reply#16 - Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:47 PM EST

                            this post should be headlined.

                              #16.1 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:04 AM EST
                              Reply

                              Bullcrap...We need MORE of our own kids and LESS massive chain migration/immigration. Its too damn expensive to have kids here though and taxes need to be cut drastically. ALL FOREIGN AID MUST BE CUT OFF IN FAVOR OF THAT ONEY STAYING HERE FOR OUR OWN KIDS

                              • 3 votes
                              Reply#17 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:04 AM EST

                              Enter math... Foreign aid is a tiny little slice of the budget. Wouldn't make an impact anywhere. Seriously... tiny. Look it up. I don't have the energy or interest to teach you.

                                #17.1 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:58 PM EST
                                Reply

                                The archaic growth model that advocates continual growth in population business consumption etc will no longer work. It is a shame that poor people and immigrants typically have more children and are less able to be taxed at a rate that will help pay for education and other social services. There are exceptions to this but according to the statistics and studies this is the trend. Some seem unaware that the people most burdened by their irresponsible reproduction are forgoing having more than one child or even electing to have no children because they do not want to bring children into the world when they can not afford to give them a good start in life. Sentimentality is not love it is a need for love.

                                Mature love can be expressed in emotion but when you truly love children you make mature choices to insure their safety and well being.

                                • 2 votes
                                Reply#18 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:14 AM EST

                                There is an interesting thing where in developing nations as you educate the women the birth rate drops.

                                • 1 vote
                                #18.1 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 12:00 AM EST
                                Reply

                                Well Duh! When same sex couples wed this is what happens,what idiot sponsered this dumb study? Two men or two women cannot reproduce and thats a fact. Woman use's plastic sex toys made in china,did I mention their plastic is toxic? Men play in each other's sewer pipe spreading aids and hipotitus. This practice can not produce children.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#19 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:30 AM EST

                                I'm not convinced you read books, let alone know how. We've figure out that AIDS isn't only the "gay man's disease" already. Furthermore, I highly doubt that the number of gay people engaging in sex/marrying has contributed to such a drastic decrease in birth rates.

                                You could use an English class or two, my 10-year-old cousin can spell better than you.

                                • 1 vote
                                #19.1 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 5:08 AM EST
                                Reply

                                Who will pay the young liberals social security, if we don't make babies? If you can't stop obama in the white house we can stop him in the bedroom…LOL

                                • 2 votes
                                Reply#20 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:50 AM EST

                                So why doesn't the birth rate in in the two most populace countries, China and India go down?

                                Some food for thought...

                                  Reply#21 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:10 AM EST

                                  Actually, China instituted a '1-child per family' policy over 2 decades ago. Their working-age population will be peaking in the next 10 years or so.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #21.1 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:57 AM EST
                                  Reply

                                  Less religion equals less births, less poverty and less wars.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  Reply#22 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 3:19 AM EST

                                  Ted, China has had a forced 1 child policy for decades to deal with over population. India's over all growth has gone down as well. The reason those countries including our own countries populations are still increasing is momentum. Simply put we are currently producing more people than are dieing off. Our population will eventually shrink if we do not have an immigration influx to offset the eventual demise of the baby boomer generation.

                                  Look, there are pros and cons to low fertility rates. The pros being that we will over all have less stress on our environment, less consumption of natural resources and over all decrease in people per square mile. I myself remember a time in my home city where we did not have traffic, ever, those days are long gone.

                                  The main argument against falling fertility is that it will eventually hurt our GDP and that we will not be able to support our government services like social security and medicare. The problem with this argument is that the only way we can have sustainability is to continue to grow. I really wouldn't want a world 40 years from now when I'm old where they US population was closing in on a billion people. No matter what your personal beliefs are in humans effecting the environment you need to believe in basic math. There is a FINITE amount of resources and space on the planet. There will come a time where if the population continues to increase it will over all effect the quality of life for everyone. And to respond to a comment made earlier in this post moving off world is NOT a way to deal with this situation. We don't have the technology to colonize other space bodies to even come close to off setting the worlds population.

                                  • 3 votes
                                  Reply#23 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 6:34 AM EST

                                  Well said, Domewars. Until we do a much better job as a society -- a global society -- in figuring out how to live sustainably rather than in constant "economic expansion" mode we cannot afford a growing world population. GDP will be moot if we continue to overpopulate and use up every resource.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #23.1 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:37 AM EST
                                  Reply

                                  Here's a radical idea. Don't have kids if you can't support them all by yourself. Taxpayers don't want to pay for non-taxpayers' many children.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  Reply#24 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:57 AM EST

                                  There is a simple reason why my husband and I only have two kids and don't want anymore. They cost too much. Two children is economically manageable--health insurance, clothes, food, school trips, fundraisers, college funds, medicine... the list is ongoing. We want the two we have to be comfortable.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  Reply#25 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:01 PM EST

                                  Well at least there's some good news today. Of course the planet's human population is right at 7 billion and rising so it's not a reason to really celebrate.

                                    Reply#26 - Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:53 PM EST
                                    Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.