
CDC
The Lone Star tick, or A. americanum, shown here, may be responsible for the spread of a never-before-seen virus that hospitalized two Missouri farmers.
When two Missouri farmers wound up hospitalized with fever, fatigue, low blood cell counts and elevated liver enzymes in 2009, doctors suspected ticks were to blame.
Both men recently had reported tick bites, including a 57-year-old whose wife plucked a single critter off his abdomen with tweezers and a 67-year-old man who figured he was bitten 20 times a day for two weeks while rebuilding fences on his 40-acre farm.
"I was getting worse and worse," recalled Robert Wonderly, now 60, of Sheridan, Mo., the victim with the single bite.
The men had all the symptoms of ehrlichiosis, a potentially dangerous bacterial infection spread by, yes, ticks. But when scientists cultured samples of the farmers’ blood, the bacteria were nowhere to be found.
“We placed it into the culture and then we didn’t get anything,” recalled Dr. William L. Nicholson, a research microbiologist who specializes in emerging and zoonotic infectious with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “And that, to us, indicated that we had something else in there that we weren’t testing for.”
That something turned out to be an entirely new virus discovered only through sophisticated genetic analysis conducted by Nicholson’s colleagues at the CDC’s Viral Special Pathogens branch. The scientists reported their findings in this week's issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
“This particular virus has never been detected before,” said Nicholson. “This is unique to the world.”
So far, the Missouri men are the only known victims of the new germ, which has been identified as a phlebovirus, part of the Bunyaviridae family of potentially serious bugs. Hantavirus, spread by deer mice, comes from that group. So does the deadly Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever.
But Nicholson, along with state and local health officials, has been scouring the region where the men were infected. They’re looking for additional signs of what has been dubbed “the Heartland virus,” after Heartland Regional Medical Center in St. Joseph, Mo., where the men were treated -- and because it was discovered in the nation’s heartland.
The new virus appears to be very rare. Although there are plenty of phleboviruses around -- more than 70 -- they are divided by the ways that they’re spread. Some are carried by sand flies, for instance. Others, like the Rift Valley fever virus, are spread by mosquitoes.
The only other tick-borne phlebovirus known to cause disease in humans is called SFTSV -- severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus -- which was recently identified in central and northeastern China.
“Even though the Chinese virus is similar, it is still quite distinct,” said Nicholson.
Researchers were able to identify the Heartland virus by using electron microscopes and next-generation genomic sequencing including total RNA analysis.
It’s not clear yet exactly how the new virus may be spread. Ticks appear to be the culprits. Nicholson and others suspect that A. americanum, the Lone Star tick found widely in northwestern Missouri and elsewhere, may be be a carrier. But other critters may be responsible as well. It’s also not clear what animals may serve as hosts, noted Dr. Scott M. Folk, the infectious disease expert at Heartland Regional who treated the two farmers.
Finding those answers will be imperative, because although the Heartland virus appears to be rare, it may not be.
“It could be responsible for more illness than we think,” Folk said.
In many ways, the new virus is just one more tick-borne problem to worry patients and doctors. The CDC lists 10 tick-borne diseases in the U.S.
The best-known is Lyme disease, which infected about 30,000 people in the U.S. in 2010. Other infections include anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis, which affect about 1,000 people each a year, and babesiosis, which infected about 1,100 people in the U.S. last year, the CDC said. There's also Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, an old disease that still strikes about 2,500 people a year.
Pat Smith, president of the Lyme Disease Association Inc., believes the new virus should help bolster growing awareness of the problem of tick-borne diseases and encourage people to realize that they can be serious.
“Maybe you don’t have Lyme. Maybe you have something else,” Smith said. “They can make you sick for a long time.”
The CDC encourages people to check for ticks after they’ve been outdoors, to use insecticides to kill ticks and to monitor dogs and other animals to prevent ticks from being brought indoors.
The two Missouri men were hospitalized for nearly two weeks and took a couple months to recover. Wonderly, who also works at the local Energizer Eveready Battery Co. in nearby Maryville, says he still has problems with short-term memory, fatigue and headaches three years after the infection.
The second victim, now 70, who agreed only to be identified by his first name, Larry, said he's fine now. Neither man seemed much impressed with being infected by a never-before-seen virus, though both are glad it didn't turn out to be worse.
"I guess I never give it much thought," said Wonderly. "But I was glad they saved my life."
Related stories:
- JP Morgan exec's Lyme infection spotlights need for quick treatment
- Missing foxes fuel spread of Lyme disease
- Tick trouble: 1,100 people got babesiosis in 2011



Sounds like the doctors need to get up to speed on these things ,just look at the suffering of those with Lyme disease and how long it took and still takes before the doctors will find it.
Say hello to more "never-before-seen" viruses after Romney gets elected and guts the CDC, state financial aid for hospitals and EPA regulations in order to allow corporations to make as much profit as they possibly can...
I live in MO and have Lyme, Babesia and Bartonella. It took 3 years to get a diagnosis, my husband figured it out and it was confirmed by a Lyme literate doctor. 9 doctors I saw before couldn't figure it out. The current testing methods, Elisa and Western Blot, are very flawed. Elisa is reported to be 50% accurate but most doctors still rely on it. We are led to believe you get a bullseye rash if you have been infected with a tick borne disease but almost 1/2 do not get one. Flu symptoms within 30 days of a tick bite is a good thing to watch for, 30 days doxycycline in a new infection is the treatment recommended by the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society. It can also be passed from mother to child before birth, through breast milk, sexually transmitted and recent studies indicate you can also get it from mosquitoes and fleas. 80% of cats carry Bartonella. Tick borne diseases are misdiagnosed as over 300 diseases...CFS, Fibromyalgia, MS, Lupus, Autisim, depression... ILADS is a good source for information.
I had a tick bite at the end of May and got Ehrlichia. I spent 11 days in hospital. It wiped out muscle coordination on my left side, and made me super weak. I had a physical therapist come in twice a week until jus recently, to help me regain my muscle strength.
viruses are THE vehicles of species EXTINCTION... they are the most debilitating form of illness readily available on earth. disease centers globally have been concocting new versions of death for 100 years, and why?to kill the enemy in case they do it to us....then gumby the disgruntled lab skag mails some to his boyfriend what dumped him and whoops! the world shrivels up some more.the brainchildren at the cdc in atlanta sent the black death to labs all over the earth by accident just a few years ago, even commies and middle eastern labs got some!
WHO are these anti-human aliens that work SO HARD to invent unavoidable death ?!
Wow!! 32 -
Yes I also recall that " accidental posting of a pathogen " so the question is how many times does that occur, without getting the attention of the media? so yes the more that " play with Fire " the greater the likelihood of a " Torched Earth " nice point you raise, thanks.
Bugs are gonna get us.
No doubt viral/ bacterial apocalypse.
#33 -
Sorry, I think you got that wrong, more like " Bugs are Us" we need to be more in-tune with nature and what so called " pathogens " are actually symbiotic that we need for the survival!.
Oh Eagle, I have to agree with Ender "Bugs are gonna get us" Wiggins. Not bacteria, though. It will be a viral apocalypse, whether man-made, natural, or a combination of both.
You cannot have a symbiotic relationship with a virus. Viruses are invisible shape-shifting demons, nano-Napoleans determined to rule the world. Just when we think we have a particular one by the tail, it changes form and behaviour by jumping to a completely new biologic entity and combining with some other virus just waiting to be mixed and cooked into something new and 100-times more lethal to man.
The scorched-earth scenario is an absolute, and viruses will see it all as they lie dormant until... well, until it is time for them to start all over again.
#34.1
Thanks for your thoughts, but please take the time and read the latest, and you will see that indeed many Viri and Humans have a symbiotic relationship, yes when we through ignorance tilt the balance the wrong way, then the chemicals released can be to our harm, and as usual " too much of a good thing can be bad "
A comeuppance rendered most gently, Eagle, and one with which the content I must agree.
LOL,, errr,,,err should I say " Thank You "?