Antibiotics may help make you fat, studies show

AP

A clump of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteria (green) in the extracellular matrix, which connects cells and tissue, taken with a scanning electron microscope. At right, the bacterium Enterococcus faecalis, which lives in the human gut, is just one type of microbe that live on your skin, up your nose, in your gut; enough bacteria, fungi and other microbes that collected together could weigh a few pounds. (AP Photo/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID, Agriculture Department)

Could antibiotics make you fat?

Two studies this week suggest that using antibiotics may save people’s lives, but could also change their metabolisms. Put together, the studies suggest that taking antibiotics might alter digestion to help people absorb calories from food they normally would be unable to digest.

Every human carries pounds of microorganisms that we couldn’t live without. They break down food and extract nutrients like Vitamin K for us. Antibiotics will kill some of these beneficial organisms, which is why so many doctors now tell patients to eat yogurt after taking a course of the drugs, to replace some of the good guys.

“There is emerging evidence suggesting the importance of the microbes in our intestines and their role in absorbing food,” said Dr. Leonardo Trasande of New York University, who led one of the studies.

The two studies look at different sides of the coin, and help answer two questions -- whether antibiotics really do affect how we absorb nutrients, and how they might do so. Together, they support the idea that the drugs kill off some populations of bacteria and allow microbes to flourish that are very good at getting calories out of hard-to-digest plant foods.

Trasande’s team looked at the medical records of more than 11,000 newborns in Britain, who were carefully followed after they were born in the 1990s. The babies who got antibiotics before they were 6 months old were 22 percent more likely to be overweight by the time they were 3 years old, the team reported in the International Journal of Obesity. If they got antibiotics later in childhood, there wasn’t a strong effect – something that could suggest the antibiotics changed the balance of the microbes as they were just setting up shop in the infants. Babies are born with sterile digestive tracts, and they acquire bacteria, yeast and other microorganisms mostly from their mothers. The germs are collectively called “flora” by scientists.

“They play key roles in immune functions, among other things,” Trasande told NBC News. “Antibiotics disrupt the development of the healthy flora in our gut. The earlier the exposure occurs, the more disruptions occur,” Trasande says. “It seems the first few days and months are important. It is difficult to reconstitute that in later life.”

The other piece of the puzzle is whether it’s the antibiotics or something else that is doing this. Dr. Martin Blaser of New York University has been studying the effects of antibiotics on the body for years. A second team he heads has been studying what happens if you feed antibiotics to animals.

They wanted to replicate what farmers have known for decades -- that giving low doses of antibiotics to farm animals make them fatter. Many experts had thought the drugs were keeping the animals from getting infections and making them healthier, but Blaser suspected something else was going on.

When his team gave mice low doses of antibiotics long-term, the mice got fatter even though they weren’t eating any more than other mice. This, they report this week’s issue of the journal Nature, suggests the antibiotics somehow make the mice absorb more calories from their food.

“We have other work that is in process that continues to confirm and extend this,” Blaser said. “That work shows that giving antibiotics early in life, similar to what farmers do in their farm animals, is changing metabolism in mice and making them bigger and fatter.”

The gastrointestinal tract is also the center of hormone production, the researchers said. It’s possible altering the organisms in the intestines – called the microbiome -- could help people better absorb nutrients and calories from “indigestible” foods such as cellulose.

The second NYU team gave the mice varying combinations of the antibiotics penicillin, vancomycin and chlortetracycline. Mice that got the antibiotics piled on more fat than other mice, even though the fatter mice did not eat more. Also, their poop had fewer calories – suggesting they were absorbing more and eliminating less.

Other mouse studies being done by Blaser’s team show that giving antibiotics to mice every once in a while -- akin to giving antibiotics to a child to treat ear infections -- also alter the gut bacteria.

So does that explain why people are getting fatter? Does every dose of antibiotics kill off some bacteria, allowing the energy-efficient species to move in and squeeze every calorie out of an apple peel or bowl of high-fiber cereal?  

“That’s at least one of the mechanisms,” says Blaser. But he notes that studies in people suggest it’s doses very early in life that matter most, just as various colonies of bacteria are getting established in the colon and intestines. And there’s an effect on the immune system, too. Other studies show that changing the balance of bacteria effects immune cells known as T-cells – something that may someday help explain links between diet and diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases and perhaps even colon cancer.

In other words, it is too soon to say whether a 5-day prescription of Zithromax for strep throat could make you fat.

“A lot of things are interconnected,” Blaser says. “Obesity is multifactorial. I am not saying antibiotic effects on the microbiome are everything but our work suggests it is contributory. Whether it’s 10 percent or 70 percent, we don’t know yet.”

Another big missing piece of the puzzle: Which species of bacteria are the most important? People have trillions of bacteria in and on their bodies. Microbes outnumber human cells by a factor of at least 10 to one and scientists believe at least 10,000 different species live in and on us. Healthy colonies of microbes not only process vitamins, but maintain pH balance on the skin, prevent tooth decay and even protect against infections. So which ones are killed by the antibiotics, and which do we want more of? No one knows yet.

“We are just beginning to scratch the surface,” said Dr. Ilseung Cho, who worked on the study in mice.

While it is important not to use antibiotics when they are not needed, the researchers stress that they do save lives. “I wouldn’t rush to come off any antibiotics right now,” Cho cautioned.

It’s also not clear if food like yogurt, called probiotics, help much. “There is a concept called prebiotics,” Cho said. “It is essentially introducing nutrients into your digestive tract that would select for particular bacteria. Then you might be able to alter the bacteria.”

Prebiotics are found in plain old food such as soybeans, jicama and raw oats, all of which are rich in compounds such as inulin, which people cannot digest, but which certain bacteria love.

Related links:

Discuss this post

Comment author avatarScott Schalinvia Facebook

That is an amazing story. I hope people don't scan the headline and then stop taking their medication!

    Reply#1 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:53 PM EDT

    How many people read this and thought, "Hmmm...So that's why I gained so much weight 30 years ago and have never been able to lose it"? (Joking.)

    • 1 vote
    #1.1 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:37 PM EDT
    Reply

    Hey - it works for livestock, why not people?

    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:21 PM EDT

    Naw, the Livestock Industry uses antibiotics to keep them alive, cause they haven't figured out how to get the immune system to work. Then they feed a product named ractopamine which makes the animal leaner. Maybe Elanco can get FDA approval, quickly, cause we already have residual amounts in the meat and get the population fit and trim. Ummmmmm Good!

      #2.1 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:58 PM EDT

      The livestock industry uses antibiotics because it was observed decades ago that low doses of antibiotics makes cattle gain weight faster. This study demonstrates a possible mechanism for this observation.

      Unfortunately the constant feeding of low doses of antibiotics to livestock is a major cause of antibiotic-resistant disease bacteria, so it's a losing proposition for society in multiple ways.

      Too bad agribusiness has enough influence to prevent the banning of this practice.

      • 7 votes
      #2.2 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:16 PM EDT
      Reply

      Well, most Americans are eating livestock that are force-fed antibiotics so Americans are getting low doses of antibiotics in the meat they eat every day. This chronic gut dysbiosis is contributing to obesity and causing a lowered immune system among other things.

      I try to eat meat that is not fed antibiotics, hormones, or drugs.

      Unless Americans are aware of this problem in the food chain, their work to lose weight and stay healthy may be futile.

      • 3 votes
      Reply#3 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:43 PM EDT

      I'm a biologist in this field and I definitely approach this whole thing with a big load of skepticism. Gut flora is a huge area of research these days and I can't quite shake the feeling that we're reliving a lot of the beliefs and research that was done in the late 19th and early 20th century. Many people, such as Kellogg of Kellogg's Corn Flakes, believed that dietary fiber and regularity were the solutions to problems such as masturbation and adultery. Sounds silly now, but was cutting edge thinking then.

      Unless Americans are aware of this problem in the food chain, their work to lose weight and stay healthy may be futile.

      I'm a big proponent of limiting portion sizes. There's numerous anecdotes out there about how our dinner plates these days are the same size as serving platters 50 years ago. There's also plenty of hard numbers about how foods have gotten to be huge. A bagel 20 years ago was maybe 120 calories. Now we have "New York" style huge bagels that are over 300 calories. A bottle of soda used to be 12 oz. Now it's 20 oz. It's about 150 calories versus 260 calories. Instead of a cup of coffee at around 70 calories, people are getting latte fancy drinks with whipped cream at well over 400 calories. It goes on.

      • 3 votes
      #3.1 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:55 PM EDT

      So where does your expertise take you in terms of immunity, antibiotic resistance, additives, hormones, GMOs, etc. I would agree that we are using technology that is forty to firty years old, and calling it cutting edge, but the real data and information is owned by those that make the most money from it.

      • 1 vote
      #3.2 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:26 PM EDT
      Reply

      As someone who almost died from Clostridium Difficile caused by a simple 7-day stint of antibiotics for a sinus infection, reading an article/study results about antibiotics without a mention of Clostridium Difficile is infuriating! Oh, I lost weight - was down to 89 pounds for weeks before I started to be able to digest even the most basic of foods. That was 12 years ago, I'm healthy, and I've only taken antibiotics once since then for pnemonia. C. Diff. is dangerous and can be deadly. Please be careful with antibiotics.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#4 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:41 PM EDT

      I share your pain. I went to my doctor with mild side pain last Dec., was diagnosed with a "probable" mild case of diverticulitis, and was put on antibiotics. They made me sick, I got C-Diff, was put on more antibiotics for that, seemed to get cured but had the C-Diff come back again, and received even more antibiotics. My "insides" haven't been normal sense. To add insult to injury, a recent partial sigmoidoscopy showed NO signs of diverticulitis, active or healed. I seemingly went through all of this for nothing and I still get the mild side pain.

        #4.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:26 PM EDT
        Reply

        the mice got fatter even though they weren’t eating any more than other mice

        So if scientists have observed this, and they believe it may also apply to humans, why are medical 'professionals' still always blaming obesity on 'lifestyle choices'? This suggests something intelligent people already know, you can eat less than a skinny person eats and still be fat. And maybe if the food you're eating has been laced with antibiotics from the meat industry, there's no way you're going to lose weight no matter how many idiots tell you 'eat less and exercise more'.

        • 5 votes
        Reply#5 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:10 PM EDT

        I would just love to follow different people around, record what they ate and weighed, then make a comparison! Of course, you need to factor in activity also.

          #5.1 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:08 PM EDT
          Reply

          The writer has made an extremely misleading and incorrect comment with the statement calling the natual flora of the gut germs, e.g., "Babies ...acquire bacteria, yeast and other microorganisms mostly from their mothers. The germs are collectively called “flora” by scientists."

          The bacteria, yeast, and other microorganisms aquired from the mother are life-supporting, not life-threatening which is what the term germs implies. The writer should correct their misstatment to say "The bacteria, yeast and other microorganisms obtained from their mother are collectively called “flora” by scientists."

            Reply#6 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:41 PM EDT

            Thank you Another 1. Yep....this confirmed what I knew but was always told by doctors it wasn't possible to gain weight. The antibiotic that did it to me was tetracycline. Had been on it a few times for infections and always gained 12-15 pounds. Also, had a slight allergy to it that went unnoticed for several years, until chatting with another doctor who was going to prescribe it. When I described what was happening...swelling in the feet, rash, and nausea....lightbulbs went off. This was in addition to the weight gain. Luckily, I never had acne, which tetracycline was used for that...though in smaller doses. Glad research is starting to catch up with what we mere mortals know. LOL.

              Reply#7 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:10 PM EDT

              I don't know who wrote this article or the people who are conducting the study, but this is no new discovery.

              A good many Doctors and Nurses in my area have been well aware of this problem for many, many years.

                Reply#8 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:25 PM EDT

                maybe its the 3 big macs and chocolate shake that they washed the antibiotics down with lol

                  Reply#9 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:13 PM EDT

                  I'm pretty sure people aren't getting fat because antibiotics may make humans' guts absorb more calories from plant foods and high fiber foods. I'm pretty sure that people are getting fatter because of bad choices related to sedentary lifestyle, and eating high calorie, processed foods. Maybe both play a role, but I'm pretty sure the sedentary lifestyle, and eating high calorie, processed foods plays a bigger role in weight gain than antibiotics.

                    Reply#10 - Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:57 PM EDT

                    Well, you say that, but babies are getting fatter, too, and they haven't been around long enough to make bad eating choices. I don't doubt that we cooperate enthusiastically with our own eating problems, but there is more going on than just that, or when you stopped eating so much, you would lose weight. And lots of people just don't, at least not nearly as much as you would expect. So, it's choices and something else, more pervasive.

                      #10.1 - Thu Aug 23, 2012 12:27 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.