E-mail updates
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe to RSSOutside, protesters were marching through the streets, demanding that everyone who needs them get drugs to treat and prevent infection with the AIDS virus and declaring, “Yes, we can control AIDS.”
Mandel Ngan / AFP - Getty Images
Activists take part in the Keep the Promise Alive 2012 AIDS march and rally on the streets of Washington on July 22,2012.
Inside, scientists were doing the same thing.
The 19th International AIDS Conference, which opened in Washington on Sunday, is demonstrating like no other forum that, when it comes to AIDS, science and advocacy have the same goals. In the 1980s, it was flamboyant but articulate demonstrators, mostly gay men, who persuaded policymakers to fund research into AIDS. Now, that very research has turned the scientists into advocates.
The thousand or so demonstrators who took to the streets of Washington D.C. on Sunday were a little louder and a little more colorful than the scientists, physicians and policymakers inside the convention center. But their messages were virtually identical inside and outside: People must stop judging patients infected with HIV, governments need to make drugs and testing more widely available, and people who might be infected need help and encouragement to get tested and treated.
In one of the first presentations made on Sunday, even before the conference officially opened, Dr. Melanie Thompson of the International Antiviral Society-USA presented recommendations that everyone get treated for the human immunodeficiency virus that causes AIDS as soon as they know they are infected.
It’s a controversial recommendation. Many doctors fear that people won’t take the drugs properly and their bodies will breed drug-resistant HIV mutants. They also worry about the toxic side-effects of the powerful drugs. But Thompson said the 15 panel members from six countries looked at the evidence and found it showed treating is better.
Then she went a step further. “We need activism, activism on the part of individuals and organizations,” said Thompson, a physician who treats AIDS patients in Atlanta.
Part of the goal of activism is to remove the embarrassment of being diagnosed with HIV, she said.
“Stigma keeps people from being diagnosed. It keeps them from being in care,” Thompson said.
Stop judgments about gay men, sex workers, drug users
In the United States and elsewhere, this means stopping judgments about gay and bisexual men, sex workers and drug users, experts stress.
“Men who have sex with men deserve to be treated with respect, and health-care providers need to interact with them in ways that promote disclosure of actionable health information,” Dr. Ken Mayer of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School in Boston and colleagues write in a special issue of the Lancet medical journal released to coincide with the conference.
Treating HIV is expensive. The cocktails of drugs that keep HIV patients healthy can cost $12,000 and more a year in the United States. But Thompson points out that some private insurance companies -- which should avoid spending money on unnecessary treatments -- have opted to pay for immediate treatment for anyone diagnosed with HIV.
Government-sponsored insurance plans should do the same, she suggested.
“It is important for us to realize that the idea of not having enough money may be that we don’t prioritize the money that we do have,” she said. “I reject the idea that we don’t have enough money. I think it is a matter of political will.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has made scientific activism work. He’s been leading AIDS research since the epidemic was identified in the 1980s, working with both Republican and Democratic administrations and convincing even the toughest budget bears in Congress to pay for AIDS research and treatment. He thinks the activist approach works when there’s hard evidence to back it up.
One good example, he said, is PEPFAR, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, which provides treatment to 4 million people globally. “I cannot imagine not reauthorizing an overwhelming success,” Fauci told a news conference.
But Fauci said it was determined advocacy that got it going. “To think that you can come down to Congress or to the administration on a one-shot basis and say, ‘This is important, please fund it’ …I don’t think there has ever been a time when I got what I asked for the first time around,” he said. “It is usually the 50th time around.”
Fauci praised the first AIDS activists of the 1980s, even if they were sometimes loud and theatrical. “But they were amazingly well-informed. They knew exactly what they were talking about. You can’t dismiss them as being some kind of group that is disruptive,” he said.
The same can happen now, Fauci said, as scientists and doctors push for universal testing and treatment as a way to benefit not only people with HIV, but society as a whole. Delegates to the conference will be highlighting the growing body of studies that show if HIV patients take drug cocktails as directed, they suppress the virus enough not only to keep it from destroying their own immune systems, but to keep it from infecting others.
But to encourage people to get treated, they first have to be tested and know they are infected. And to ensure that everyone gets tested, Fauci and other medical experts at the meeting will stress, societies need to work harder to reduce the stigma of a diagnosis, work to get hospitals and clinics to test everyone, and then get public and private health insurers to pay for treatment.
Related links:
- Panel calls for HIV drugs for everyone infected
- AIDS conference opens with an eye to a cure
- A critical turning point for HIV
Leave a Comment:
I feel the end is near for this disgusting thief of human intamacy.
http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/recent/2010/1214_2010_b.html
Treat everyone who has it or may have it and it will die out. Treat the community not the disease to prevent transmission.
Zinc Fingers are the answer for not only HIV, but for a whole lotta things!
Zinc fingers are essential components of proteins used by living cells to turn genes on and off. Their name derives from the atom of zinc that holds two loops of protein together to form a “finger.” Because the fingers recognize specific sequences of DNA, they guide the control proteins to the exact site where their target gene begins
ASLO ANTIBODIES
http://healthland.time.com/2012/04/05/study-explains-how-the-first-effective-hiv-vaccine-worked/
More lies there are no 100% accurate tests for H.I.V. this is just another modern day eugenics program.
And, you are qualified to make such a bold statement why? Please post your qualifications or go away!
TO THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD . . .
All of our forces are in place. To the North, we have truth. To the South, we have fact. From the West we have the eternal infinite resolve of the American people. We will seek accountability for the secrets revealed in the secret virus development program. The “flowchart” of the “Special Virus” program will continue to guide humanity throughout the 21st Century, as we close one of the darkest chapters in the history of the “civilized” world. We are grateful to have established dialogues with the current Congress, Surgeon General and officials at the NIH, NCI and the White House. The August 1999 unveiling of the flowchart of this secret U.S. virus program is being hailed as one of the greatest document finds in the history of the world.
WHAT WE NOW KNOW
As we head toward the end of the 20th Century, we know that we have participated in an irreversible chain of human events that ill ultimately lead to the
deactivation of AIDS. This view is supported by the significant events over the last two weeks. The NIH’s Dr. Cargill is amenable to assisting us find the
$250,000 we need to host an AIDS ORIGIN RESEARCHER CONFERENCE. Her December 15, 2000 email is located in the appendix as are a number of documents and correspondence. It is my February ‘99 letter to President Clinton that served as the impetus for the President to declare the AIDS Virus a “National Security
Priority” earlier this year. Anyone who is looking for the historical overview of the development of AIDS will want to review my letter to the New York Times.
I am not providing these voluminous documents to outweigh any other point of view. I am providing these documents in which others might be able to retrace my
efforts and reach similar conclusions. The flowchart is the recipe for AIDS. If that is true. We will offer to the new administration that we can recreate a batch of AIDS, thus strengthening our position that we can take AIDS apart. It has been necessary for the top echelons of government to assist in the proliferation of AIDS, because they knew the “Trojan Horse” virus would need an
incubation period. In light of the sophisticated secret virus development program, it will be very difficult for any one to argue they didn’t know what the ‘mystery illness’ was.
All of our energy and resources will focus on our presentation of this information to the Bush administration. We have not hesitated in our position
that there will be no other agenda item on the table of mankind but for this issue. Come inauguration day, the dust of a stale election will give way to the
reality of the truth and the fact of U.S. involvement in the development of AIDS. The secret program’s “research logic” makes it unequivocally clear. This federal program was attempting to develop an immune suppressing virus. If this “Special” virus is not the “AIDS” virus, then this federal program will easily be able to account for the 15,000 gallons of AIDS the program produced in 1977.
It is our contention the federal government “complemented” the vaccine programs
of Africa and Manhattan. Many of the documents in the appendix support this position. In other words, the flowchart proves the United States was seeking to
produce the AIDS virus. The epidemiology of the virus suggests the two epi-centers earmarking the true man made nature of the alleged mystery illness.
People just don’t get it because they don’t want to get it. They didn’t give Black people ‘niacin’ although they knew it would cure them of the dreaded ‘pellegra disease’. Once they gave Black people the niacin, they immediately began a secret study of Black people and untreated syphilis. when that study was finally revealed, they had the “Special” virus ready to go. Soon we will meet with the Surgeon General of the United States of America. General Satcher had not previously seen the flowchart or had any prior knowledge of this secret virus development program.
Our DAY 14: WORLD WAR AIDS pronouncement on December 14 2000 was a result of the breakthroughs in the official government silence that we have achieved. Next to all the aforementioned exhibits, documents, correspondence and papers, it is probably the 1978 memorandum about Blacks that is most hideous. The 1978 document devises a scheme to offset negative African American sentiment when
Black America learns the United States was “depopulating Africa.” We have all of the information we need to prove our case against the United States. It is our nation state who is guilty of the highest crime. We have found the well-spring of the genesis of AIDS, it is us.”
Boyd Ed Graves, J.D. 12.20.2000
Email:
Website:
Postal Address:
Boydgraves.com
c/o Zygote Media
PO Box 332
Abilene, KS 67410
1-800-257-9387
State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS. By Boyd Ed Graves,
J.D.
In 1988 the Committee to Restore the Constitution documented the gene splicing work done at Ft. Detrick, Maryland (now NIH) uncovered by Dr. Theodore Steckler. By splicing sheep visna virus and bovine leukemia with human tissue they created a retro virus we now call AIDS. A retro virus is a virus that mutates, AIDS mutates very rapidly, from one host to the next.
The World Health Organization (a United Nations organization) vaccinated people in Haiti, Brazil, & Central Africa with smallpox vaccine that contained AIDS. Drs. Robert Gallo & Luc Montagnier put out the CIA cover story about a green monkey biting a native on the rear starting AIDS. AIDS does not exist naturally in any animal. The green monkey’ s kidney is used to cultivate the smallpox vaccine. This monkey would have had to be a jet pilot to have started this disease in three countries at the same time.
On May 11,1987 the front page of the London Times reported “smallpox vaccine triggers AIDS virus” WHO (the World Health Organization) murdered Africa, they immunized the people with its new weapon, AIDS. WHO conducted the most intense immunization program in it’s history against small pox and on the tail end of this program to eradicate small pox they used this new weapon, vaccinating millions with AIDS. The figures of vaccinations with AIDS in Africa are as follows; 36,878,000 Zaire; 19,060,000 Zambia; 14,972,000 Tanzania; 11,616,000 Uganda; 8,118,000 Malawai; 3,382,000 Ruanda; 3,274,000 Buruni. 14,000 Haitians on United Nations secondment in Central Africa prior to their return to Haiti. Let us not forget the WHO executive Board for 1980 Chairman: Dr. A.M. Abdulhadi (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) Vice Chairmen: Dr. Dora Galego Pimentel (Cuba) Dr. Shwe Tin (Burma) Professor I. Dogramaci (Turkey) Rapporteurs Dr. Adeline W. Patterson (Jamaica) Dr. D. Barakamfitiye (Burundi).
AIDS was then injected into the US, in New York about two Years later in Hepatitis B vaccine. Due to regular of the occurrence of hepatitis B in the homosexual community because of sodomy, they lined up for their shots and spread it in America.
In 1994 Bryan Elison and Co-author Dr. Peter Duesberg of the University of California had their book “ Why We Will Never Win the War on AIDS” censored, bought out and banned by elements within the US government. Because these AIDS researchers uncovered yet another lie. HIV does not cause AIDS! There are over 5000 case studies of people with full blown AIDS that never had HIV. HIV is like other harmless viruses after your body produces antibodies that kill it, it can be found in your limp glands (dead). Now here is the truth about HIV. If left alone it does nothing, but when diagnosed the medical community recommends ( at the recommendation of CDC) treatment with the “AIDS cocktail”. This cocktail contains a toxic failed cancer chemotherapy AZT. Which causes anemia, bone marrow loss, muscle wasting, virtually destroying your immune system and mimicking AIDS and killing you.
The Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) simi-secret agency, Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) which many refer to as the medical CIA, still maintains that HIV causes AIDS and supports the AZT death sentence. EIS members have been scattered throughout the World Health Organization, one became Surgeon General two others became assistant Surgeon Generals and let us not forget Jonathan Mann and Michael Merson were the heads of the WHO’s Global Aids Program.
The Public Health Department was set up years ago to protect the public from communicable diseases. They would quarantine infection persons caring diseases. They would notify the public and ask their help to isolate such problems. Today however the times have changed. If you have AIDS your privacy is guaranteed, and you are not isolated. Your employer can’t be told without your permission even in the food preparation industry, yet a food service worker on average cuts his finger 2 to 3 times a week .
1990 CDC ruled blood as a toxic substance all protective precautions to be taken by health care professionals. Teachers are given latex gloves to handle children with injuries that are bleeding. You can’t inform the school or parents which children have AIDS. Early on we were told AIDS is a hard virus to catch as it is a very fragile virus”. It was also stated that the virus had been isolated in “many different bodily fluids including saliva and tears’.(WHO chronicle 39(6)p.208 1985). Yet the Pasture Institute and Lancet, a prestigious medical publication, revealed AIDS virus stays alive in dried bodily fluid for 7 days, 14 days in wet bodily fluid. AIDS virus will stay alive in a dead body for over18 hours. It was found pouring alcohol on AIDS virus for 20 minutes will not kill it. Bleach full strength or 1 to 5 parts water will kill it in dried bodily fluids. May 5th 1990 (vol. 335 p.1105) Lancet revealed AIDS transmitted at a soccer match Dec. 1989by an infected player hitting heads with another player exchanging blood. Lancet 1995 AIDS transmitted at wedding during a fist fight. We were told at first kissing was no problem but the saliva contains blood 91% of the time after kissing. Skin is not a barrier as any abrasion, or cut allows in the virus. A doctor died from AIDS after contracting it when blood squirted into his eye during an operation. The CDC has warned eye Drs. not to store contacts in fluid from other patients, do they mean to tell us tears may transfer the virus? Mucus membranes will absorb the AIDS virus even though the skin is not broken.
Coughing, sneezing , and breathing can expel bodily fluids in a mist and the AIDS virus has been found to stay alive for over 2 feet outside the human body.
The RCMP spent over 1/2 their budget over 3 years tracking down tainted blood that had been bought from prisons in Arkansas during the Clinton governorship, that was contaminated with hepatitis and AIDS. Most of which went to the manufacture of products for hemophiliacs.
The schools pass out condoms to our children to promote “safe sex”. Laytex has microscopic holes that measure 3 microns in size, the AIDS virus is only 1 micron , that like me or you walking through a door. We have been lied to on a grand scale. We have been told that we are safe, but when following the governments and medical community advice we are being murdered.
WHY YOU MAY ASK? WHO PROFITS FROM MURDERING 5 BILLION PEOPLE?
The AIDS industry is $300 billion a year industry. But that is not the whole story.
It was during the Jimmy Carter era that what has been known as PLAN 2000 (later Global 2000) was first discovered by George Green. Green was asked to be a finical advisor within the Carter administration two years prior to the election. The administration revealed plan 2000, the plan to reduce the world’s population to under 2 billion around the year 2000. Green bailed out of the administration only to reveal the plan.
Further documenting the outcome of this plan through documents from the Corbin Clubs dated Sept 20,91. U.S. Representative Gephardt was its Secretariat at that time. Corbin Club “mandates compulsory population control in 166 nations.” They agreed that United Nations Security Council would be implementing these policies;
A. “that all nations have a quotas for REDUCTION on a yearly basis, which will be enforced by the Security Council by “selective or total embargo of credit, items of trade including food and medicine, or by military force when required”.
B. The Security Council Will “ inform all nations that outmoded notions of national sovereignty will be discarded and that the Security Council has complete legal, military, and economic jurisdiction in any region in the world and this will be enforced by the Major Nations of the Security Council”
C. “will take possession of all natural resources, including the watersheds, and the great forests, to be used and preserved for the Major Nations of the Security Council.”
D. “ The Security Council of the UN will explain that not all races and people are equal, nor should they be. Those races proven superior by superior achievements ought to rule the lesser races, caring for them on the sufferance that they cooperate with the Security Council. Decision making, including banking, trade, currency rates, and economic rates, and economic development plans, will be made in stewardship by the major Nations.”
E. “ All the above constitute the New World Order, in which Order, all nations, regions and races will cooperate with the decisions of the Major Nations of the Security Council.”
This purpose of their document is “ to demonstrate that action delayed could be fatal. All could be lost if mere opposition by minor races is tolerated and unfortunate vacillations of our closest comrades is cause for our hesitations. Open declaration of intent followed by decisive force is the final solution. This must be done before shock hits our financial markets, tarnishing our credibility and perhaps diminishing our force.”
Haven’t we heard this racist “final solution” stuff somewhere before? All quotes from their document above are accurate.
Documentation from Negative Population Control of Teaneck N.J., a non-profit organization founded in 1972,concures.Their advisory board reads like a who’s who of major universities in the U.S. and England, their director at the time of their publication was Donald W. Mann. Their “solution” is the same “drastic reduction in human numbers over a period of years.” Their goal: “to under two billion for the world” and “not more than 150 million for the US” in the same time frame. They advocate “spending 50 % of US annual foreign aid for population assistance programs”
The Missler Report
Did HIV exist prior to 1976?
How was HIV distributed to thousands in New York and Africa?
Was AIDS purposefully manufactured for population control?
On June 9, 1969 (the same month as the Stonewall Uprising launched the Gay Rights Movement) Pentagon spokesman Dr. Donald MacArthur testified before Congress: "Within the next five to ten years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organism. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately five years at a total cost of $10 million." (HB 15090, pg 129) Indeed, "a disease-causing organism... refractory [resistant] to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease" appeared within "5 to 10 years." HIV is the first and only disease to fulfill such a definition. Proving that AIDS emerged simultaneously in Africa and America in the late 1970s, Scientific American (March 1996) published, "The African AIDS Epidemic," which states: "One frequently mentioned explanation for the severe epidemic in the AIDS belt is that the virus originated here and continues to move outward from an epicenter of disease. But AIDS cases appeared in hospitals in Uganda and Rwanda at the same time they did in the West, and no stored human-tissue samples taken from Africans during the 1970s are HIV-positive."
Disregard for American life is emphasized in domestic use of biological warfare against American citizens. Part of the story was in Phoenix Letter (November 1992.) This described Congressional approval for U.S. Army development of an artificial AIDS virus in 1970. This shocker is part of a larger story.
A REPORT ON THE ABUSE OF POWER
Editor: Anthony C. Sutton December 1993 Vol. 12, No.12
BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
AGAINST AMERICAN CITIZENS
A once free United states has become an "us" versus "them" society. Similar to the early Hitler years in Germany (burning of the Reichstag = Waco massacre) with touches of Stalinist horror (extermination of the "kulaks.")
The late Gary Allen (of None Dare Call It Conspiracy fame) used to cite Nelson Rockefeller's habit of terming Americans "peasants." But Gary had no idea how far elitist contempt for the "peasants" had gone even in the late 1960's.
Compare Waco with Somalia. The FBI and BATF used tanks to destroy Koresh and his followers. The U.S. deliberately used tanks against American citizens.
In Somalia the U.S. sent in Rangers and U.S. troops without armored backup although assaults without tanks and self propelled artillery are doomed to failure. The White House threw away 7 American lives using McNamara "rules of engagement" in Somalia. In Waco the "rules of engagement" concept was thrown out the window.
Disregard for American life is emphasized in domestic use of biological warfare against American citizens. Part of the story was in Phoenix Letter (November 1992.) This described Congressional approval for U.S. Army development of an artificial AIDS virus in 1970. This shocker is part of a larger story.
Here's another installment of the domestic biological warfare story:
U. S. Army-CIA jointly used biological agents against American citizens inside the U.S.
These agents included: bacillus subtilis, smallpox and AIDS.
The Federal Government has concealed then lied about these programs and placed the blame elsewhere, including the former Soviet Union.
State Department attempted to counter an exaggerated Soviet propaganda war using these programs but tripped up because State did not know how much authentic information had leaked inside the U.S.
The Phoenix Letter is mailed monthly and maintains a conservative free-market economics philosophy.
Editor: Anthony C. Sutton. Information contained herein has been carefully selected from sources
.Phoenix Letter, Suite 216C, 1517 14th St West, Billings, MT 59102
Fort Dietrich Biological
Programs In The 1960's
Fort Dietrich in Maryland is the U.S. biological warfare base. Originally called U.S. Army Biological Laboratories it is now labeled U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID)
The Army maintains a Special Operations Division (SOD) on the Fort Dietrich base with a formal operating agreement with CIA (Memorandum signed in May 1952.) Both CIA and Army have covered their tracks well but some original documents survive to outline a horrific story.
In the early 60's U.S. Army SOD personnel used specially designed suitcases to spray unsuspecting American civilians with bacillus subtilis at the Greyhound Bus Terminals in Washington, Chicago and San Francisco. Similar operations were conducted at airports in Washington D.C., New York, Boston and Los Angeles. The number of one way tickets sold at time of release was used to estimate distribution of the bacterial agents. (Bacillus subtilis can be bought at biological supply houses. It is not listed as a pathogen, but can cause respiratory infections, blood poisoning and food poisoning.)
According to declassified Army documents the Greyhound terminals in San Francisco and Chicago were the location for "six operatives to launch covert attacks" spread over 7 days. Specially designed suitcases sprayed bacteria into crowded terminals for maximum exposure. Photographs were taken and other Army personnel "covertly collected air samples in close proximity to the passengers" to determine if the civilians had been infected.
Later tests were repeated with smallpox a2ents, grown in large quantities and converted to a lethal powder for spraying. Senate investigation in 1975 revealed close cooperation between SOD and CIA:
"CIA association with Fort Dietrich involved the Special Operations Division (SOD) of that facility. This division was responsible for developing special applications for biological warfare agents and toxins. Its principal customer was the U.S. Army. Its concern was with the development of both suitable agents and delivery mechanisms for use in paramilitary situations. Both standard biological warfare agents and biologically derived toxins were investigated by the division."
The Senate Committee found the CIA had covered its tracks to conceal this unconstitutional activity from the American public. The Senate Committee stated "Although some CIA originated documents have been found in the project files it is clear that only a very limited documentation of activities took place."
An extract from a U.S. Army report details why smallpox was selected as the agent of choice." Its "attractive" features are listed as:
1. Smallpox is highly infectious with close contact. It spreads readily from an infected person to susceptible individuals.
2. A long incubation period of relatively constant duration permits the operatives responsible to leave the country before the first case is diagnosed
3. The duration of illness for those who recover is relatively long. Although the Federal Government claims that the 1972 treaty banning biological weapons stopped further use of Fort Dietrich we know that the U.S. Amy applied for $1.4 million appropriation to EXPAND germ warfare testing ability in the early 1980's. Senator James Sasser objected and it is unlikely that the appropriation went through. It could have been handled on the "black budget."
THE ORIGINATOR OF AIDS
In July 1969 Dr. MacArthur, Director of the U.S. Army Advanced Research Project Agency (ARPA) appeared before Congress (the Appropriations Committee of the House) and stated:
" within a period of 5-10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired."
This synthetic anent is AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency syndrome virus or HIV-1) ARPA requested $10 million to develop AIDS, 10 years before the virus was identified in the field.
Dr. MacArthur added, "It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to another method of massive killing of large populations."
From 1961 to 1968 while this artificial biological agent was under discussion in the pentagon, Robert McNamara was Secretary of Defense. Clark Clifford (of BCCI notoriety) took over as Secretary in 1969.
On October 2, 1970 just 15 months after Dr. MacArthur requested an apl2rol2riation for AIDS development, Robert McNamara, now World Bank President, made a speech to international bankers in which he identified population growth as "the gravest issue that the world faces over the years ahead."
In his speech to the bankers McNamara argued that population growth was leading to instability, that a 10 billion world population would not be "controllable."
Said McNamara, "It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not sure but there are two possible ways by which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way."
In brief, Robert McNamara was in the final decision making role for development of AIDS at the very time he was contemplating the idea that "world death rates must got up." THIS IS MORE THAN COINCIDENCE.
Our conclusion is that Robert McNamara knowingly encouraged development of AIDS as a means to reduce the worlds' Population. It is difficult to arrive at any other Conclusion.
New From Russia
Slowly bits and pieces of hidden history are leaking from Russia. Official U.S. history is that the U.S. was fighting only Vietnamese in Vietnam. It now appears Soviets were there as well, fighting U.S. Soviets had casualties, so far 16 admitted killed in action.
This explains the heat this editor came under with National Suicide: Military Aid To The Soviet Union. A detailed criticism of our technological aid to the Soviet Union while the Soviets were aiding the Vietnamese kill Americans. No wonder we came under so much pressure to keep quiet! Our big businessmen were actively committing treason! If the Soviets were fighting in Vietnam, then the Soviets were an active enemy, not a passive onlooker.
Henry Kisssinger and Robert McNamara won't look too good in the light of history when the full story comes out. The Best Enemy Money Can Buy is still available from Liberty House Press 1-800-343-6180. (It's a rewrite and update of the original National Suicide: Military Aid To The Soviet Union which caused a storm 20 years ago.)
Soviet Union Charges Pentagon With Aids
Development
This information became known to the Soviets and in October 1985 the Soviet Union mounted a world wide propaganda campaign. Aids had been manufactured at Fort Dietrich Maryland by the Pentagon. The initial information was planted in a Soviet backed newspaper in India and then surfaced in more than 30 media sources world wide. The report was backed by an East German report by Professor Jacob Segal of Humbolt University, East Berlin. Segal argued that the AIDS virus is "the product of an abortive experiment carried out at a laboratory to develop biological warfare means."
This Soviet propaganda campaign was discounted in the West (this Editor included.) It was beyond the realm of rationality that the U.S. would develop a killer agent such as AIDS.
Professor Segal appears to hold the view that it was "accidental" i.e. an "abortive experiment." This position we also held for a while, until the McNamara speech of October 1970 surfaced.
In any event in the late 80's the U.S. State Department ran a rebuttal campaign to the Soviet charges. However State was unaware that the Congress had published Dr. MacArthur's requests and statements so the rebuttal fell flit on its face. The State Department for example claims the U.S. Army had never used Fort Dietrich as a biological warfare base. This is just not true. Further State apparently had no knowledge of the McNamara contemplation of rising death rates by design.
Conclusions
1. CIA - U.S. Army undertook field tests with bacillus subtilis and smallpox against American civilians.
2. There is no question that the Army received funds from Congress for AIDS development and this was probably undertaken at Fort Dietrich.
The AIDS release could have been accidental but we discount this for several reasons. Initial cases came from Africa and Haiti, not the United States. Second, Robert McNamara had simultaneously called for increase in world death rates. This suggests a deliberate policy of controlled release of the AIDS virus.
3. The Soviets obtained the information and used it for a propaganda campaign.
The State Department rebuttal was ineffective because State had no idea how much information had already been made public.
Postscript
Phoenix Letter has reported a new string of AIDS virus, much tougher, much more dangerous and possibly airborne. In early 1990 Science reported that AIDS researcher Dr. Robert Gallo had tested an altered AIDS virus, one that could infect' cells previously left uninfected by the early AIDS strain. This new strain was reported as infecting epithelia] cells thus raising the possibility that the AIDS virus is now airborne.
We find it extraordinary that any risks are taken today, after the Cold War has ended with these agents. What is the rationale in developing stronger- airborne strains?
ROBERT McNAMARA AND ENVELOPMENT OF AIDS
December Phoenix Letter we described how the U.S. Army (ARPA) developed the AIDS virus with ten million dollars voted by Congress in 1969.
The Secretary of Defense at that time, and responsible for approval of the 1969-1970 budget, was Robert McNamara, followed by Clark Clifford of BCCI notoriety. The final decisions for the AIDS program was made by McNamara and Clifford.
The standard biography of Robert McNamara Promise and Power (The life and time of Robert McNamara) by Deborah Shapley (Little Brown, Boston 1993) has interesting comments on the McNamara view of world over population and the critical need to reduce world population i.e. an excellent rationale for development of a virus resistant to cure.
In 1966 McNamara warned that world population was growing faster than gross national product and that the World Bank had a dominant role to play.
In 1969 McNamara's speech to the Governors of the University of Notre Dame cited the population explosion as more significant than the danger of nuclear war. "Casting its shadow over all this scene is the mushrooming cloud of the population explosion" (page 480).
McNamara extended the extraordinary thesis that "the children who were dying were fortunate, for the millions of those who lived languidly on were stunted in their bodies and cripples in their minds."
Shapley points out that inside the World Bank these McNamara views on population sounded almost nutty" and many wondered where McNamara had gotten these ideas.
But this was precisely the time when McNamara moved from Secretary of Defense to take over the World Bank. The same year, 1969, when the U.S. Army went before Con2ress to ask for $10 million to develol2 an AIDS virus.
By 1973 (page 5 1 0) McNamara had steered the World Bank to explore the cycle of overpopulation, insufficient food and poverty and in the Fall of 1973 at the annual meeting of World Bank Governors in Nairobi, Kenya outlined his QUANTITATIVE GOALS for population. "Nairobi" became synonymous with the McNamara population reduction five year plan. Coincidentally Nairobi and Kenya became initial focal points for the AIDS virus. Kenya and Uganda in East Africa is where the epidemic began and where today some 50% or more of the population is infected.
In 1977 McNamara spoke at MIT and argued that world population was exploding at an unacceptable rate. McNamara was so intensely carried away with the ideas of population explosion that he reportedly (at a lunch meeting) started to scribble numbers on the dining room table cloth, "there was no stopping his verbal torrent or his emotion." The table cloth was tinged with scribbled numbers and "looked like an artifact left by an ancient visitor from another world." (page 560)
The Shapely book has a great deal more on the McNamara fervor to control world population. While development of an AIDS virus may appear to most of us as tragically even murderously wrong, to a ideologue like McNamara it would appear to be opportunity to solve what he saw as potential disaster.
Matching the time frames and the opportunities for decision making there is a least a prima facie case, well worth investigating, that Robert McNamara knowingly and deliberately encouraged development of the AIDS virus.
Phoenix Letter views the McNamara program, continued by Clark Clifford, as genocide.
BOOK REPORT. AIDS: THE UNNECESSARY EPIDEMIC
(Stanley Monteith, MD Order from Aids Book, 618 Frederick Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95062 $17.00 post.)
Dr. Monteith was one of the very first to recognize the significance of AIDS and has devoted over 20 years of his life to investigation and warning about the dangerous nature of the disease to everyone. We distinctly remember meeting with Dr. Monteith as far back as 1981 when he prophetically laid out to this Editor the epidemic potential in AIDS. This long before even African Governments had recognized the killer potential.
This book, excellently written and produced, contains Dr. Monteith's conclusions and is far in advance of other AIDS books simply because he is well aware of the elitist nature of world control. The neglect of government and politics to face up to the disease and its implications is clearly outlined and we are left with the question is this deliberate neglect to destroy the United States? Although Dr. Monteith does not touch on the documentary evidence published in Phoenix Letter concerning the roles of U.S. Army (Fort Detrich) and Defense Secretary Robert McNamara (indeed this would be irrelevant for the medical approach) Dr. Monteith's evidence is entirely consistent with the argument that there is deliberation in the spread of AIDS.
More surprising we learn in great detail how the Gay Lobbies are insistent in policies and actions that encourage the epidemic.
You will read that Congressmen Panetta (Clinton Cabinet) and Congressman Waxman of Los Angeles are associated with policies that promote the epidemic. How American Medical Association, Centers for Disease Control, and the Surgeon General attack any doctor who dare propose monitoring or controlling the disease. The numbers of HIV infected are just not known, they are mere crude underestimates because Government refuses to adopt procedures that would give us a realistic count.
For your personal protection we urge you to read this book. It will be a harsh dose of realism to counter the propaganda pap issued by Government and AIDS lobbies.
AIDS Was Deliberately Created By the United States Government
AIDS is a synthetic biological agent, knowingly and deliberately created by the United States Government. Development funds were not included in any secret "black budget," they were openly voted on by Congress.
In 1969 Department of Defense representatives appeared before the Defense Subcommittee of the House and requested $10 million in 1970 DOD Appropriations for design and manufacture of a synthetic AIDS virus.
Specifically, on Tuesday, July 1, 1969, Dr. MacArthur of the Army Advanced Research Project Agency made the following statement to the Subcommittee:
"There are two things about the biological field agent I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technical surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of five to ten years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired."
MacArthur later submitted more detail to the Congressional Committee. The key points were:
1. Up to this point, (1969) all biological agents are naturally occurring.
2. It is possible to make a "new infective micro-organism" that would be "refractory to the immulogical and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious diseases."
3. A research program would take six years and $10 million.
4. The program should be initiated through the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council (NAS-NRC).
5. The matter was discussed with NAS-NRC and "tentative plans were made to initiate the program.
The report added:
"It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to another method of 'massive killing of large populations."
By 1972, the World Health Organization called on scientists to work on such viruses "to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on the immune function." (WHO is supposedly devoted to "health" progress and financed in part by the U.S. taxpayer on this supposition. See Bulletin of World Health Organization, 1972, 47:257-63.)
Dr. Theodore Strecker, a health care consultant, has tracked the story of AIDS through WHO and collaboration with U.S. Army Laboratories in Fort Detrick, Maryland (now National Cancer Institute.)
Apparently, the AIDS virus was released in Uganda, Haiti, Brazil and Japan about 1972-74. This was not an accident. It was deliberate release. (See Who Murdered Africa by William Campbell Douglas, M.D., P.O. Box 1568, Clayton, GA 30525.) AIDS entered the United States through the New York Blood Center/Centers for Disease Control in the late 1970's.
In conclusion, we note that Congress knowingly, voted funds for this development program in the 1970 Appropriations.
Source: United States House of Representatives. Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations 91st Congress, 1st Session, Department of Defense Appropriations, for !970, Part 5 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, HB 15090. JULY 1. 1969, Chairman Robert Sikes of Florida.
A REPORT ON THE ABUSE OF POWER
Editor: Anthony C. Sutton March 1994 Vol. 13, No.3
AIDS Epidemic Cover Up
HIV-AIDS is a virtually out of control epidemic with government officials and gay lobbies jointly imposing censorship to hide the true picture from the American public.
Half a dozen books have emerged in recent months which tell similar stories: gay lobbies control AIDS policy and only interested in preserving rights, whatever happens to the rest of America.
Because of their united lockstep, political power gays dominate the AIDS political scene. Gay rights have absolute precedence over public health.
There is disturbing evidence that the virus is transmitted by more than sexual contact and blood. It is certainly carried by (one testing procedure is based on saliva) and may be airborne. Initial experiments demonstrate airborne capability. Government officials dominated by gays refuse to follow up with research on these initial findings, because the gay lobby fm monitoring and quarantine. Right now AIDS has the potential to wipe out the world but @ treated as an infectious disease. Doctors cannot routinely monitor, test and report, they are restricted by official limitations not applied to other infectious diseases.
Oh not this conspiracy crap again.
Oh darn. You caught us. I'm a gay man, and I can attest that I spontaneously generate HIV. I then breathe it out through pores in my forked tongue, which also allows me to seduce Congressmen. Looks like the gig's up, guys! :(
I don't buy the scientist/activist thing. I do understand that the scientist could work with a passion to "find a cure" but I do believe it can "skew" good science. It would be like the a scientist working on global warming.. but ignoring results that don't "support" his passion... otherwise if they can remain objective then it is cool.
You bet we can. Just keep your d*ck in your pants and needles out of your arms.
and stick your head in the sand... it will just go away....
Which is exactly what many ill informed (or not caring) people want to happen!
@transcalifornia, Truth hurts. HIV and AIDS are preventable. We have people dying from Hep C, which I realize is also preventable, and the government won't give any money to help get people tested and treated. All of the funding goes to HIV.
What makes one infection more important than the other? Both can be prevented and both can be fatal.
What will all these research grants do after the cure has been laid out?
UNLIKE CANCER research and all other aspects of treatment and delivery and advertising and so on and so on which is a multi- multi- billion dollar global business.
And your point is what exactly?
To confuse people like yourself.
There is too much money in disease and not curing them.
Thus it is not profitable to cure these diseases.
I, for one, want to know what happened with the DRACO broad spectrum antiviral. I fear that it has been buried because big pharma wants to continue selling these people products for life instead of just dosing them once. I would appreciate it if one of you reporters would do that.