Dads' jobs linked to birth defect risks

By MyHealthNewsDaily Staff

Certain jobs held by men in the months before they conceive a child may increase the risk of birth defects, a new study suggests.

Researchers analyzed information from more than 14,000 fathers whose jobs fit into at least one of 63 categories.

The study found certain jobs were linked with an increased risk of multiple types of birth defects in children. These jobs included: mathematicians, physicists, computer scientists; artists; photographers and photo processors; food service workers; landscapers and groundskeepers; hairdressers and makeup artists; office and administration support workers; sawmill operatives; those working with oil and gas; those working in chemical industries; printers; those operating cranes and diggers; and drivers.

The researchers did not have information about chemicals or agents the men may have been exposed to at their jobs that could increase the risk of birth defects in their children, and so could not determine whether the jobs were indeed the cause of the defects.

However, the researchers pointed out  that occupations in which workers are commonly exposed to solvents — such as artists, chemical workers, pharmacists, chemical engineers, painters, dry cleaners, printers and plumbers — were associated with an increased risk of eye, heart and intestinal defects, and oral clefts.

The findings mean that these jobs that should be investigated further for their potential to cause birth defects, the researchers said. The results can also help researchers figure out what types of chemicals commonly used in certain jobs might increase the risk of birth defects, they said.

Among children born in the U.S., birth defects occur in about 1 in 33 babies, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Andrew Olshan, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and colleagues obtained the job histories of just under 10,000 U.S. dads who had a child with one or more birth defects born between 1997 and 2004, and job histories of just over 4,000 dads whose kids did not have birth defects. The jobs included in the study were those held by the father for at least the three months before conception and the first month of pregnancy.

The researchers classified the jobs into 63 groups, based on their assumed exposure to chemicals or other potential hazards.

The researchers examined the link between these jobs and more than 60 birth defects.

Nearly a third of job types were not associated with any increased risk of birth defects. These included architects and designers; health-care professionals; dentists; firefighters; fishermen; car assembly workers; entertainers; smelters and foundry workers; stonemasons and glass blowers; train drivers; soldiers; and commercial divers.

Jobs associated with specific types of defect included artists (associated with defects of the mouth, eyes and ears, gut, limbs, and heart), photographers and photo processors (associated with cataracts, glaucoma and absence of or insufficient eye tissue); and landscapers and groundskeepers (associated with gut abnormalities).

The study is published today (July 17) in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

More from MyHealthNewsDaily:

Discuss this post

Mathematicians? What are they doing that would cause birth defects? Working on computers or something? Toxic pencils? Hmm...I knew there was a reason I didn't major in math. It turns out it really isn't good for you...hehe.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:51 AM EDT

I was wondering that, too. My suspicion is that it must be either computers or something very common in an office setting. I didn't see any desk jobs on the list of "not associated with any increased risk" occupations - aside from architects and designers, which I know nothing about one way or the other.

    #1.1 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:10 AM EDT

    LOL

      #1.2 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:07 AM EDT

      A lot of them are driving cabs etc.

      • 1 vote
      #1.3 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:10 AM EDT

      Yeah more info would be nice. I'm in the computer scientist category with a baby 6 weeks away. Is he going to have an abnormally big butt?

        #1.4 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:36 PM EDT
        Reply

        All I can say is it took long enough. How many defects were there that could have been prevented a long time ago?

        • 1 vote
        Reply#2 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:06 AM EDT

        Prevented how, by having no food service workers or physicists?

        I do wonder if they will see a link with autism.

        • 2 votes
        #2.1 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:05 AM EDT
        Reply

        Duh! Your environment causes birth defects. Men living in air polluted environments, such as harlem, are advised to move out to cleaner air and wait 90 days before conceiving. It takes 90 days for sperm to rotate out of system

          Reply#3 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:32 AM EDT

          90 days? I think your wrong about that one bud.

            #3.1 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:30 AM EDT
            Reply

            "The researchers classified the jobs into 63 groups, based on their assumed exposure to chemicals or other potential hazards"....doesn't that mean that they already decided that chemicals are the cause, and then guessed about exposure? Chemicals might very well be the cause, but should they try to document exposure rather than assume it? Does the exposure necessarily happen in the work place? What if these guys are getting exposed somewhere else in their free time or at home? I am no epidemiologist, but this seems like a weak study.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#4 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:54 AM EDT

            I read awhile back that that white out stuff they used to use back in the day was highly toxic. Anybody remember that stuff?

              Reply#5 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:08 AM EDT

              Yeah I remember the "blond" joke that no one gets anymore because hardly anyone uses that stuff any more, it is going the way of carbon paper (BTW I am a blond so I am allowed to quote the joke): "How can you tell that a blond has been using a computer? Answer: By the whiteout on the computer screen."

              • 1 vote
              #5.1 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 10:07 AM EDT

              That's funny! I'm not blonde so I don't mind blonde jokes...

                #5.2 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:11 PM EDT
                Reply

                What a dumb study. What are men supposed to do? Take months of leave from work and go live in the woods and eat nuts and berries before trying to conceive a child, which can be no easy task for some. Ridiculous weak and unnecessary study that can not be concluded without a ton of more studies and waste of money. No man is going to take off work before conceiving a child and all the financial responsibilities that come with it. Just flippin stupid.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#6 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:28 AM EDT

                There very well may be (serious) deficiencies in the study. But, Alial totally misses the point. First, exposure can only be avoided when the agent is identified and exploratory studies are the start of the process. Second, when evidence of a deleterious effect is established, exposure is avoided when the agent is removed from the environment or appropriate safety mechanisms created and implemented. Men (and women) should not have to quit their job or leave their neighborhood to be safe from environmental harmful pollutants--duh. Employers don't have a god given right to harm their employees or their offspring!!!!

                  #6.1 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:27 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  Seems to me like this article is riddled with defects...

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#7 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:46 AM EDT

                  I wonder why this article makes no effort to explain why mathematicians, physicists, computer scientists and office and administration support workers are at risk? That seems to me like the obvious question anyone would have after reading this. Even just to say they don't know would be better than ignoring the question altogether.

                  Most of the others make sense on some level but what is the risk source for these jobs? Maybe if you sit in front of a computer 40-50 hrs a week, maybe there are fumes from the plastics being released or something? Hmm.

                    Reply#8 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 10:03 AM EDT

                    both of my son's dad's kids (one with me one with his ex) had near sightedness in the left eye so it has to be him whose the contributing factor and the fact that he's a welder being exposed to dft chemicals and stuff.

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#9 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:02 AM EDT

                    So you tell us that certain jobs will lead to birth defects, yet you don't tell us anything else. You don't even post a link to the source.

                    What kind of article is this? A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

                      Reply#10 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:09 PM EDT

                      This study doesn't pass the smell test. The list of jobs associated with multiple child birth defects pretty much covers the entire spectrum of jobs. Sounds like a very flawed study.

                        Reply#11 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:35 PM EDT

                        Husband worked with computers our whole marriage. 4 kids, no birth defects. Now I feel like we won the lottery!

                          Reply#12 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:06 PM EDT

                          although i have a lot of chores i try painstakingly to spare some of my time for msnbc actualities since iam quite sure that these actualities make me very happy,iam very well convinced with msnbc great efforts that made it in such a paramount position,hoping more success,bye,ahmed abdo.

                            Reply#13 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:34 PM EDT

                            That's a pretty large list of common professions; so basically if a future dad has a job, his child is at an increased risk for birth defects. I think the researchers in this case have been around chemicals too long.

                              Reply#14 - Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:49 PM EDT
                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.