
Photo courtesy Charles Rathmann
Charles Rathmann, 40, a St. Louis research director was the first of 242 volunteers accepted for a research project that collected samples of their cells to map the microbial make-up of healthy humans.
Charles Rathmann never thought of himself as a model for American manhood, but when it comes to the bugs on his body, he is.
The 40-year-old St. Louis research director is among 242 volunteers whose skin, nose, mouth, gut and other samples have been collected and analyzed to create what scientists are celebrating as the first map of the normal microbial make-up of healthy humans.
“I am an ordinary guy,” Rathmann told msnbc.com. “But they can use the normal flora on my body to set a baseline.”
Indeed, the release of coordinated research Wednesday from the Human Microbiome Project Consortium organized by the National Institutes of Health promises to revolutionize the study of the microorganisms that inhabit people, experts told reporters.
"This is a whole new way of looking at human biology and human disease," said Dr. Phillip Tarr, a researcher and professor of pediatrics at the Washington University School of Medicine. "It's awe-inspiring and it also offers incredible new opportunities."
Instead of the one-germ, one-disease theory that has governed past thinking, doctors and patients alike will need to consider the entire ecosystem of bacteria at work in the body, much like the ecosystem of a forest in nature.
"This is going to be a whole new ballgame," Tarr added.
Scientists are just starting to use the new HMP data to understand disease, including the role of the gut microbiome in maladies such as Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, the skin microbiome in psoriasis, and the urogenital microbiome in reproductive and sexual diseases, among many other projects, experts said. It could become crucial in figuring out remedies for serious and potentially deadly C. difficile infections, which are blamed on disruptions in the normal flora of the gut, Tarr said.
Scientific reports being published this week include two in the journal Nature and 12 in journals from the the Public Library of Science or PLoS. The reports represent work from some 200 members of the HMP Consortium from nearly 80 universities and scientific institutions reflecting five years of research, according to the NIH.
For the first time, researchers used sophisticated genome sequencing techniques to find that instead of the few hundred bacterial species previously identified through laborious cultures, there are more than 10,000 microbial species inhabiting the human body.
Microorganisms outnumber human cells 10 to 1 and they make up between 1 percent and 3 percent of the body’s mass, the researchers found. In a 200-pound adult, that means there are between 2 pounds and 6 pounds of bacteria, "a rather remarkable amount," said Dr. Eric D. Green, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute.
The new data, which will provide a shared database for the scientific community, showed that people harbor a whole range of microbes, including beneficial bugs and also pathogens known to cause disease. The microbes in healthy people appear to be much more diverse from site to site than expected, and also from person to person, researchers found. In addition, they were surprised to learn that the specific bacteria at a site are less important than the functions they perform.
"It appears that bacteria can pinch-hit for each other," Curtis Huttenhower, a researcher at the Harvard School of Public Health explained in a statement. He was co-lead author of one of the HMP papers published in the journal Nature.
Information like that is exactly why Rathmann agreed to be scraped, poked and prodded for science.
“I liked the fact that this was going to be a way for them to learn more about these little bacteria that exist invisibly on us,” he said.
Researchers collected a total of 5,298 samples, plucking them from up to 18 body sites of Rathmann and the other volunteers, including 129 men and 113 women, from Houston and St. Louis.

Photo courtesy National Institutes of Health
This gut bug, the bacterium Enterococcus faecalis, is among those analyzed through novel genome sequencing techniques as part of the Human Microbiome Project Consortium coordinated by the National Institutes of Health.
Participants included some of Rathmann’s friends and colleagues, even his ex-wife, in part because Rathmann’s actual job is to round up subjects for clinical trials at the Washington University School of Medicine.
“My group tries to recruit volunteers,” said Rathmann, who is director of the Recruitment Enhancement Core at the WUSM Center for Clinical Studies.
“We get involved any time we see a trial that is interesting. It helps move the medical community forward.”
In this case, Rathmann and the others had to prove they were healthy, undergoing screening tests, blood tests, even dental exams to make sure their microbes weren’t unusual.
“If you had a cavity, you were out,” he said. “You could take no medicines that would disrupt the flora they were trying to identify.”
The samples were collected over a period of several weeks starting in 2009, when Rathmann and others had to agree to use study-issued shampoos, soaps and toothpastes during the testing period.
The actual collection of the microbes was simple and not painful, Rathmann said. It involved scraping cells from 15 sites in men and 18 sites in women, who had vaginal swabs taken from three places.
“It was the mouth, teeth, back of the throat, inside of the elbow, back of the ear,” Rathmann recalled. “You also had to give a stool sample on two or three different occasions.”
Researchers took these samples, all from adults ages 18 to 40, then analyzed them using a novel genetic sequencing technique that was able to identify the DNA of bacteria, ignoring the normal human DNA.
Using computers, the scientists sorted 3.5 terabytes of data to get a full picture of the human microbiome, the collection of microorganisms living in the human body.
What they found was riveting, reported the scientists, who figure they’ve now identified between 81 percent and 99 percent of all genera of microorganisms in healthy adults.
One paper published in PLos ONE found that there were certain core bacteria present in 95 percent of all subjects. But even among those core bacteria, there was a wide range among sites -- and among people.
"Our findings include the fact that humans carry a remarkable range of microbes," said Bruce Birren, director of the Genomic Sequencing Center for Infectious Diseases. "Apparently there are many different ways to be healthy when it comes to our microbes."
Launched in 2007, the HMP has been funded through $153 million from the NIH Common Fund, which invests in high-impact research, and another $20 million from individual NIH institutes and research centers.
Until today, Rathmann had not seen any of the research associated with his body samples. Participants didn’t receive maps of their individual microbiomes and they have no idea what particular bugs they harbored in various places.
“I definitely will follow the results of this,” said Rathmann, who hopes his example will prompt others to volunteer for clinical trials. “Our flora will be the benchmark now for what everybody studies.”
Related stories:
- In praise of germs: Why common bugs are necessary for kids
- Neti-pots linked to brain-eating amoeba deaths
- Woman loses arm to flesh-eating bacteria from bath salts
- Half of hospital rooms rife with drug-resistant bug, study finds
- VIDEO: Gadgets and gizmos for germophobes



Sadly, -omic studies suffer from our incapacity to interpret the data.
Tell me about it. I just mapped over 1500 unique phosphorylation sites in brain proteins that are altered in neurodegenerative disease. OK. Now what? Just to understand the function of a few of those modifications would take a couple of years! At least I have grant fodder now! (maybe)
Congratulations anyway. But realistically, what do we do now? Time for NIH to wake up.
""If you had a cavity, you were out," he said. "You could take no medicines that would disrupt the flora they were trying to identify."
This kind of statement and research makes no sense, seeing that more than 60% of the Worlds population do not receive the immunization regime we give to individuals here in the USA. Already, their data is compromised. The "New Normal" should be the mapping of a human without the introduction of immunizations, hormonized-food, or other chemicals we use on our bodies and put in our bodies. For these guys to "not have cavities" already tells me that they have fluoride in their system at the very least, which already means there systems are compromised with a chemical substance.
What a load of BS!!!
The data is definitely compromised given the reasons cited below.
They aren't trying to find what is normal, they are trying to set a baseline for healthy people and to make a first go at understanding the microbiome. If we use toothpaste with fluoride - then that is part of what we should be looking at. They are not interested to see what kind of biome is representative of a native jungle dweller who never used shampoo. Not yet. Good grief, these things take time. Anyway, why should that be considered "normal?"
What is a load of BS is your demand for pristine, Garden of Eden conditions to study the biome. Further, you don't recognize that they were trying to control for things between the participants that could alter their biomes during the study. They wanted to normalize things such as shampoo and soap because those would be sources of variation between participants. If they hadn't done that - this study would be BS.
Your critique of the study seems to be more of a critique on modern society and therefore is off base. What good would it do us to understand the biome of a fictional person from an organic utopia? That's not where we live.
If we can begin to understand the role and function of these bacteria we can take steps to better manage the health of people all over the world - without antibiotics and harsh medicines.
But it's just a load of BS, says the person who has never performed any useful research in their lives.
Actually, radagast, starfox makes some good points but you do too. I think that this study was a good one but we need to do a study on people who don't use all of the soaps, fluoride, med's, etc. that we do so that we can understand how our new "normal" deviates from something closer to Nature's normal. In doing that we may learn of things we are doing today that disrupt our natural microbe populations and make us more susceptible to health problems. It would be a fascinating study as well.
If I understand the Article as stated, It targets and ignore the Bodies DNA... It is a Baseline. Now a Baseline is exactly that, even if the the "data" is compromised... you have a base line to "measure" off of.
Let me briefly explain: I used to be a medic for 20 yrs, we took baseline Blood pressures of Hypertensive patients. Thou they already have a "compromised" BP, it gave us a "starting point' to base treatment. Now I do agree that "data" interpretation in the article will take years but this a worthy starting point and I'm am certain that the sampling group will be increased and methods will improve.
One of the chief benefits from the Human Genome project was the accuracy and the speed of genetic mapping so I expect similar breakthroughs with this research. Cut the scientist some slack..... I'm a Creationist and I give them their just do.
242 sample size...what are the demographics of this group other than 129 men and 113 women? Race/age/socioeconomic status. Also, were the participants paid to participate? The fact that one of the participants helped with recruiting seems strange if you're looking to generalize to the entire population...
"Participants included some of Rathmann’s friends and colleagues, even his ex-wife, in part because Rathmann’s actual job is to round up subjects for clinical trials at the Washington University School of Medicine."
This study seems flawed. But I'm just a public health program evaluator so what do I know?
As a first of its kind investigation what would you have them do? Do you have any idea how expensive it is to sequence and sort through that much genetic data and be able to confidently identify that many species? The data from this study is very useful in that it serves as a template for more extensive studies and provides a first look at what future studies might expect. Of course people in different countries would have different biomes. They are well aware of that. What they are calling "normal" is simply their baseline data to which they can make comparisons. They are not making the case that these people represent the normal biome - only that these people are "healthy." They state quite clearly that even amongst these individuals that there is a great deal of heterogeneity in the results. They conclude that there are most likely many combinations of healthy biomes. This data will always be available for future comparisons and is simply the first collection of field data into what will most certainly be an international collaborative effort to fully understand the human microbiome.
But aren't they skewing their sample by including his ex-wife, etc...or at least narrowing the scope of the samples? Of course they could always get more people to study, but surely he and his wife have many of the same flora. Way too few people to get anything statistically significant. Plus, what is normal for the St. Louis area may not be normal for healthy individuals in L.A. As you point out, it is a start but I would think they would not want to include too many people from the same circle of friends/colleagues even at this early level of study...unless it is just more convenient.
I just seriously doubt they have really identified close to 80% of the normal flora in all perfectly healthy individuals except in that small subset they are studying; or am I misreading?
So if I keep myself exceptionally clean, I could lose 2 pounds? Sorry, couldn't resist,,,over and out
SHEESH PEOPLE, it's JUST the start...WOW...it is probably BETTER than ANYTHING you have done in YOUR lifetime...sheesh...
ANY movement forward to hopefully find a cure for psoriasis/eczema is a blessing. My son, granddaughter, myself, looking forward to progress from this study, if not in my lifetime for others. Also know people with colitis, very difficult for them. Volunteers - THANK YOU ALSO!
Well, back to keeping the humors in balance, lol. Everything old is new again.
As above so below. Isn't the Universe a beautiful place? If only people could work together with as much harmony as Nature.
HAHAHA...NATURE BATS LAST!!!
Did they find the "homosexual" microbiome yet?
Isn't it interesting to note, the sheer size of the universe, and our tiny little planet.. and on that tiny little planet that one cannot see from the outskirts of just our own galaxy, that there are microscopic creatures that live in and around our bodies? ... Is it not safe to say that... we as humans are microscopic as well?
Reality is relative.
-C.M.