By Jennifer Welsh
LiveScience
Genes in charge of making sperm cells may be the key to understanding male infertility and even developing male contraception, two new studies indicate.
With this new information in hand, scientists say a male non-hormonal contraceptive may be just five to 10 years away.
Infertility remains a sensitive topic, and about 25 percent of cases remain unexplained. Getting a better grasp on the genetic causes of infertile men could lead to better treatments, the researchers say.
"The irony is that it is the fact that these men don't have children that makes standard family-pedigree analysis very challenging, and as such it has historically been extremely difficult to identify genetic causes of specific cases of male infertility," Lee Smith of the University of Edinburgh in Scotland, who studies male infertility, told LiveScience.
Fertility genes
The results, published today (May 24) in the American Journal of Human Genetics, are based on a study of the genetics of a group of men who belong to a religious group called the Hutterites, pacifist, self-sufficient colonists similar to the Amish.
"Hutterites [forbid] contraception and uniformly desire large families, providing an outstanding population in which to study the genetics of normal human fertility," study researcher Carole Ober of the University of Chicago explained in a statement. [ Birth Control Quiz: Test Your Contraception Knowledge ]
The researchers studied Hutterite men with one or more children, taking both family size and birth rate into consideration. They uncovered more than 40 genetic regions that influence how fertile a Hutterite man is, and then compared these with genetic sequences from a sample of Chicago men, in which nine of these same regions seemed to impact fertility.
"We do expect that genes identified … in the Hutterites will be relevant fertility genes in other populations, especially those that were also associated with sperm parameters in our validation studies" of the Chicagoans, Ober told LiveScience.
The next step, Smith said, is to use animal models to figure out the functions of these fertility-impacting genes. In another study, also published today, in the journal PLoS Genetics, Smith does just that.
Immature sperm
Smith and his colleagues fed drugs to mice that gave them various genetic mutations. Next, to pinpoint genes related to fertility, the researchers identified the infertile mice of the bunch. They then traced the infertility back to the gene mistake that caused it and looked at its effect on the mouse's sperm cells.
The researchers identified one specific gene, called Katnal1, that is crucial for sperm formation. Without the protein created from this gene, mouse sperm can't mature in the testes. These immature sperm are infertile.
The researchers think the same genetic link to infertility may be found in humans; if they can find a drug to manipulate Katnal1 levels in men, or do so permanently using gene therapy, the result might work as a non-hormonal contraceptive. The findings also may explain some cases of infertility: Perhaps the man has a natural mutation that messes Katnal1 up.
"Identification of genetic mutations associated with infertility that affect the supporting cells (and not the sperm themselves) could lead to personalized gene therapy (replacement of faulty genes) for male infertility within five to 10 years," Smith said. "All of the components have been tested and validated in rodent models. Likewise a genetic vasectomy … could also be available within five to 10 years."
More from LiveScience:
6 (Other) Great Things Sex Can Do For You
The History and Future of Birth Control
5 Myths About the Male Body


READ WITH ME...
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER.
Men will have full control over their fertility with no worries that a woman will turn condoms inside-out and do the SWISH. The male sexual revolution is about to begin.
too funny, dude. I think birth control should be MANDATORY for all males and females under the age of 25. That would help curb the population growth a bit. That way young people can get a decent start of their lives and a support structure in place by the time they are able to have children.
.....Well, at least the Catholic church might soon attempt to deny contraceptive medical insurance coverage indiscriminately to both sexes.
Ian Emdee -
Funny. Damn funny.
since men have traditionally considered birth control to be a womans' responsibility even if this becomes available i doubt men will use it.
Amazing what we are learning about the human genome.
Save your money, consume regular amounts of genetically modified foods and let the Monsanto Roundup glysophate render you and yours infertile in no time at all
Or just get snipped.
Keeping your jeans zipped is the key to male birth control.
I'm sorry, but that doesn't always work - a guy (or woman) being able to keep the zipper closed. Hormones tend to rule some times. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Can't wait to see the T-Party, Evangelical Right Wing "Christian", and similar other's take on this one!
Do you think they'll invite a panel of women (no men allowed) to comment? Will Rush call him a stud (isn't that the opposite of slut?). To all our female posters, no offense intended...just sarcasm.
I just think it's ironic that to study male infertility, scientists (wisely) choose a group of ultra-religious men who believe that believe that contraception is immoral and that the purpose of life is to marry and have large families:
God: Contraception is bad! Instead - go forth and multiply to spread my word!
Hutterites: Ok.
(Trolling God quietly laughs in the background as he makes random Hutterites infertile thus, in essence, introducing divine contraception which he has already banned as immoral to the marriage.)
Sanity - as a woman, that tickled me.
Yeah, queue the crickets...... Ha!
There already is male contraception that studies have shown is 99.8% effective (birth control) over 2 years. However, there is little money in it, so no incentive to use it. This secret contraceptive is testosterone injections. If men want to conceive babies, they go off it and in 2 months they are fertile again.
Infertility is a GOOD thing. I don't understand why so many articles try to persuade us otherwise. Why are we spending millions of dollars to "treat" a "disease" that ISN'T a disease at all, but rather, a massive blessing?
See, call me paranoid or a moron or an anti-medical breakthrough jackass but I have a major problem with any "replacement of faulty gene" technology. Not a single week goes by without a new commercial saying "If you took (insert bag drug name) you may be entitled to money from a class action lawsuit". I really do not want to see the one where they say "If you have had your genetic code modified and your RNA got confused by the new protien chains and now you are covered in tumors". You will be testing that there treatment for a good many years before I will trust it. 5-10 years they will have it maybe. 50 or 60 before I would consider it.
Ladies, honestly, would you really trust a man with birth control.
about as much as you can trust a woman with birth control.. it is nice that people have it but if they don't use it right or take it all what is the point in having it
but I hear what you you are saying, personally if I was a woman i wouldn't trust some of the guys out there
I wouldn't sleep with someone I didn't trust.
I think if a man is willing to take that responsibility, just as I would, it would mean we are both being responsible. I wouldn't share myself with someone unless I was in love with them and the trust issue has already been satisfied.
Not until he is the conceiver! LOL!
Given the number of paternity cases that pop up, I think some guys would be willing. Regardless, I will use birth control for my own peace of mind.
Just 5-10 yrs away. Funny, I heard that 30 yrs ago and every 5-10 yrs since. Same with a cure to baldness, HIV, common cold, yadda yadda. One thing is for sure...if I were a woman, I wouldn't jump the plane knowing that someone else packed my chute.
I would be all over this. But I wonder if most men would? The male psyche is, largely, critically stupid and base (I can say that, being a man - and everyone knows it is true anyways). We are driven by very simplistic motivation. I imagine many men would view this as an affront to their manliness, virility, or capability in bed.
Perhaps we should figure out how to cure male idiocy first.