Santorum says porn is bad for you. Is it?

By Stephanie Pappas
LiveScience 

With a statement decrying the Obama administration's "blind eye" toward enforcement of federal obscenity laws, Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum has brought the subject of pornography into the presidential campaign. But some of Santorum's statements about the ills of explicit material may not hold up.

In a statement first posted last week on his campaign website, Santorum cites "a wealth of research" demonstrating that pornography causes "profound brain changes" and widespread negative effects in both adults and children, including violence against women. There's no such evidence of brain changes, researchers say — though the question of pornography's harmfulness is still in some dispute.

"It's very easy if you want to support one side or the other, to pull a particular study," said Paul Wright, an assistant professor of telecommunications at Indiana University, Bloomington, who has studied sex in the media. "Anybody can support one side or another by simply isolating a particular study and talking about it."

Most experimental studies on the effects of pornography have focused on college students, given their easy proximity to the psychology lab. Looked at individually, these studies seem mixed. Some find that exposing young men to porn increases sexist attitudes and even a willingness to inflict pain, often tested by having the men inflict what they believe are real electric shocks on a woman. (The shocks are fake.) Other studies find little to no effect. [Sex Quix: Myths, Taboos & Bizarre Facts]

To pull this disparate research together, psychologists depend on meta-analyses, or studies that analyze data from multiple single studies. Using this technique, Wright said, the effects of pornography are "fairly clear."

"In experimental settings where actual aggressive behavior is measured as the outcome measure among males, both violent pornography and nonviolent pornography increased the probability of subsequent aggression," Wright told LiveScience.

Not all researchers put stock in experimental findings, however.

"The question became do these little tests that we're having these guys do [in the lab], do they really apply to real life?" said Chris Ferguson, a psychologist at Texas A&M University who studies the link between media and violent behavior.

In real life, of course, researchers can't carry out controlled experiments on pornography. One alternative strategy has been to look at sexual violence rates in countries right after pornography is decriminalized. These studies, many done by Milton Diamond, the director of the Pacific Center for Sex and Society at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, usually find that rates of sexual violence go down after pornography becomes more prevalent. Diamond sees this as evidence that pornography actually provides a catharsis for men who have sexually aggressive tendencies. [A Brief History of Porn]

"The majority of the pornography dissipates the arousal by masturbation and I think that works both for males and females," Diamond told LiveScience. "And usually after somebody masturbates and they have their orgasm, they're not as interested in sex as they were 10 minutes before, so I think it dissipates the interest to go out and do anything illegal."

There's no proof of this catharsis effect in the countrywide studies. It's not even possible to firmly link the drop in violence to pornography at all, given the large number of other factors that could play a role. The decriminalization of pornography could go hand-in-hand with other societal changes that influence sexual violence, Ferguson said. Women might even be influenced by a more porn-saturated society to accept violence against themselves and not report sexual aggression, Wright pointed out. Or some other, non-porn-related factor might play a role.

Nonetheless, some researchers see the countrywide correlations as telling.

"When you have people that are making these kinds of claims, that it's a major contributor to men's aggression toward women, it makes sense to look at if that societal data point exists," Ferguson said. [Internet Pornography Statistics]

If the laboratory studies are correct that pornography does increase male violence, it's a small to moderate effect, said Wright, who is quick to point out that he does not advocate censorship in any case.

Researcher Neil Malamuth of the University of California, Los Angeles, has found that exposure to pornography doesn't affect the average man. But for men with other risk factors that predispose them toward sexual violence, "it can add fuel to the fire," Malamuth said.

"It can make a person who perhaps has a certain proclivity, a certain inclination, a certain risk profile even more likely to act out in a sexually aggressive way," Malamuth said.

Risky characteristics include hostility toward women, a narcissistic personality, and a tendency to derive gratification from power and control over women, as well as background characteristics such as growing up in a violent home.

Perhaps different studies are capturing different proportions of men with these characteristics, which would explain the conflicting results, Malamuth said.

The focus on the link between pornography and aggression glosses over other potential pitfalls of porn, including working conditions for the porn actors and the pressure on women to look or act like a porn star. But some researchers are taking a closer look at the potentially positive sign of sexually explicit media. In surveys, pornography users generally see porn as a boon, said Malamuth.

"Pornography may have many beneficial effects for some people in their sexual lives, and many don't see themselves as harmed in any way," Malamuth said.

In one study published this month in the International Journal of Intercultural Relations, University of Hawaii at Manoa researchers compared poses of women in photographs taken from popular pornography websites, magazines and porn-star portfolios, in Norway, the United States and Japan. These three countries were chosen because they fall in different portions of the United Nations' Gender Empowerment Measure, a measure of women's political and economic power in a nation. Norway is No.1 globally on the scale, the U.S. is No. 15, and Japan is No. 54.

The researchers compared "empowering" and "disempowering" poses in the popular pictorial pornography of each nation. An example of a disempowering photograph would be a woman tied up or contorted, with little care given to her own comfort. An empowering photograph would be the opposite, for example an unbound woman facing the camera with confidence.

The researchers found that disempowering photographs were equally common across all three countries. But Norway had the highest number of empowering photographs, followed by the U.S. The findings suggest that pornography may mirror the gender equality or lack thereof of society at large, according to study researcher Dana Arakawa, a doctoral student at the University of Hawaii at Manoa.

"It's a reflection of what our culture produces to show what is sexy about women or what should be considered a sexual ideal," Arakawa told LiveScience. The fact that relatively equal Norway exhibits more examples of "empowering" images of sexual women is heartening, Arakawa said. Most Americans have a vision of porn stars as stereotypically pouting Playboy bunnies, but that view of sexuality is limited in scope, she said.

"There is variety," Arakawa said. "Pornography isn't just what we know of in the U.S."

More from LiveScience:

Read the latest health news from Vitals:

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

The Ayatollah of Pittsburgh has much in common with the Ayatollah of Tehran.

  • 13 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:14 PM EDT

Show me a normal guy without a porn stash.

It's not a question of if he's got one. It's just a question of where he keeps it.

And the gigantic numbers of porn site visitors on the Internet just reinforces this.

.

  • 8 votes
#1.1 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:33 AM EDT

I can't wait for all the ignorant-holier-than-thou types to elect someone like Santorum so then we can all live in as much fear as people in Iran. Then, Americans will realize the importance of preserving their rights over mandated morality.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Mon Mar 26, 2012 3:54 PM EDT

I dont have a porn stash, I have a wife that loves se x

    #1.3 - Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:48 PM EDT
    Reply

    So what, exactly, did this article say again?

    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:18 PM EDT

    Nothing. Absolutely nothing.

    • 2 votes
    #2.1 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:35 PM EDT

    it said Rick Santorum is out of ideas and will now say anything to appear anywhere in the news.

    • 20 votes
    #2.2 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:20 PM EDT
    Reply

    PORN addiction is a very bad thing, I dont think we need porn police, so I'm not for santorums ideals; but to say porn does not cause problems is insane. I agree violence is not the problem!

    Addiction to porn is a problem, I do not think more anti freedom laws is the answer to that. Education is........no one ever discusses desensitization from watching too much porn........thats the real problem.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#3 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:04 PM EDT

    I agree...some people have narcissistic/intimacy issues and begin to substitute porn/masturbation for relationships with live people, they end up causing a lot of trauma and grief for people around them

      #3.1 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:05 PM EDT

      Sean - my anecdotal evidence showed that they key to a happy marriage was to skip the social imperative to reproduce. Keeps the trauma and grief at bay....

      • 4 votes
      #3.3 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:13 PM EDT
      Reply

      I just wish the press media could get their hands on Santorum personnel computer for examination. Normally, anyone that speaks out/against something like this - is knee deep in the stuff = and trying to draw the attention away from their self.

      • 11 votes
      Reply#4 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:35 PM EDT

      Apparently he's watched too much porn. That explains his mental condition.

      • 5 votes
      Reply#6 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:19 PM EDT

      Will some body please tell these people who do these report, to just go out and ask MEN this question, Does Sex Feel Good Or Not? Does it hurt, when having Sex? And to be P.C. even ask Homosexual. The only time it hurts, is when someone does not want to give it up freely! Men give it up for free, all the time, why can't women, oh and the awnser to that is they want to get paid first.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#7 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:30 PM EDT

      Perhaps it is because women often are not as interested in sexually activity as men, and are doing so to please the man they are with. It is a natural thing for many women. We think differently, we feel differently. I do not know from personal experience, as I have never been in a relationship for various reasons (the big one being that I am still very young and in university!), but we definitely learned about the differences between the male and female brain, not to mention certain aspects of anatomy. What matters is finding a way to make the relationship work for both persons...

      • 3 votes
      #7.1 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:11 PM EDT

      Women need to be paid to have sex. Even modern women with complete control over their fertility with a dozen methods of contraception are uncomfortable with the idea that their wet hole should not cost the same as the man doing the bulk of the sexual work.

      • 1 vote
      #7.2 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:55 AM EDT

      Vincent: I bet you have never satisfied a women. Bet you have never had a relationship other than the ones you have to pay for.

      Women wouldn't ask for payment, if men were not so free with their money.

      And, besides it takes a lot more than a minute or two to satisfy a normal woman.

        #7.3 - Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:30 PM EDT
        Reply

        Billy Chrystal said it best: "Women need a reason to have sex, men just need a place."

        • 9 votes
        Reply#8 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:36 PM EDT

        Great editing job. Three paragraphs then repeat the first two...nice. I could do a better edit job.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#9 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:46 PM EDT

        Too much of anything is bad. That is true for porn as well. There is little to no sex education anymore, and what is there, is more about the parts than the act. Porn, in good taste (ie non violent and with class) can be very instructional to couples. It teaches techniques to people that sometimes barely know how to please their partner. Good sex is as important to a good relationship as communication. Both need to stimulate your partner, and without the ability to stimulate your partner in both forms will ultimately ruin the relationship.

        • 6 votes
        Reply#10 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:10 AM EDT

        I don't have a problem with books, but watching others get it on turns me off. Rather just use the imagination :)

        • 1 vote
        #10.1 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:15 PM EDT
        Reply

        Pope Rick Santorum should realize that all the laws/rules he speaks about were not being enacted under GOP presidents - where does he get the idea that the president can or should rule the lives of women, men, consenting adults or anyone in a relationship? I think he should go back to PA or wherever he calls home and stay there - keep his mouth shut and let the rest of us enjoy our lives.

        • 4 votes
        Reply#11 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:02 AM EDT

        MG from IL

        --NO, NO, NO!!! We don't want him back! Send him and his sweater vest into exile somewhere with a laptop and lets see what he looks at.

        • 4 votes
        #11.1 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:59 AM EDT

        Agreed. Speaking out against porn is about repressing natural male desire to view images of naked women.

        Some woman will speak up about how porn is for men that can't get real pussy, but the truth is that modern porn is highly preferable to a relationship with a woman only for an average sexual experience at a very high male emotional and financial cost.

        • 1 vote
        #11.2 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:53 AM EDT
        Reply

        If ever there were someone in the world who needed to spend about 24 hrs in a porn palace, it is this stiff frigid freak.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#12 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:26 AM EDT

        Santorum can't handle the real issues affecting the country, so he's going to focus on porn. If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull$hit.

        • 4 votes
        Reply#13 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:44 PM EDT

        That is Santorum's pandering to the female 51% electorate. Are there any candidates that speak up for men's issues?

          #13.1 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:51 AM EDT

          No, he's not speaking up for women.

          I don't have a problem with porn. Most of the women in my social circle also don't have a problem with porn. Some of us don't enjoy it or aren't interested, others do enjoy it, but one way or another, we do not want this freak pushing his views in our bedrooms.

          • 2 votes
          #13.2 - Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:22 AM EDT

          Vincent: from your above posts, you do not like women.

            #13.3 - Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:32 PM EDT
            Reply

            I think Santorum may have been watching to much porn.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#14 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:56 PM EDT

            One does wonder why all the obsession with other peoples' sex lives?

            • 3 votes
            #14.1 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:16 PM EDT
            Reply

            Santorum is scrambling and grabbing at straws. He'll try any and all tactics, proven or otherwise to get people's attention. He'd better have his house in order. I,m sure he's being vetted all the way back to when he was a kid. I hope he threw his teenage wallet away, you know, the one with the embedded circle.

            • 2 votes
            Reply#15 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:31 PM EDT

            I dont understand what's wrong with a little "fun"? Besides if our president were to have enough time to fret over porn i would only want him to focus on the child and slave side of it, not the adult consensual side.

            • 4 votes
            Reply#16 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:17 PM EDT

            So, Rick, how long have you suffered from "profound brain damage"?

            • 2 votes
            Reply#17 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:13 PM EDT

            I have no doubt that porn leads to more frequent beatings. Just not of women....

            • 2 votes
            Reply#18 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:38 PM EDT

            Porn leads to all sorts of violence, choking chickens, spanking monkeys, the list is endless.

            • 2 votes
            #18.1 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:48 AM EDT
            Reply

            Porn frees men from the sexual monopoly of women as it provides men with the quantity and variety (who cares about quality) they crave. High-rez TVs of the future will only enhance the male sexual experience, and women that expect to be funded at $1k/month for dating will have to compete.

            • 1 vote
            Reply#19 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:48 AM EDT

            I was married to a porn idiot. This man was incapable of a real physical relationship. I am a good-looking, in shape woman so there was no problem there. I wasn't controlling but was a very sweet wife. I got tired of seeing the "man" sitting on the sofa in his bathrobe playing with himself. And what sex life we had was incredibly dull and unproductive. Not that I didn't try ,I did all the stuff to make it exciting, dressing up, trying to be the "part"...none worked. I divorced his sorry butt and I'm sure his sex life hasn't changed one bit since I left. He was more into video of me than into the real thing. He was constantly wanting to add a third person into the equation. Probably more to watch than to be a part of it all. What a piece of pathetic manhood and society says this is good? His attitude towards me was one of absolute nothingness. I counted as a means to an end for him in all respects. Now he is free to continue his personal sex life all to himself. He's a perv...end of story.

              Reply#20 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:38 AM EDT

              I think that had more to do with your ex having problems than the porn.

              • 2 votes
              #20.1 - Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:24 AM EDT
              Reply

              Porn may negatively effect your sex life, but watching Santorum is definitely detrimental to the sex lives of both men and women. Vote "NO" to Santorum's personally mandated "morality."

              • 3 votes
              Reply#21 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:27 PM EDT

              Porn has largely been regarded as a safety net for women against those that may assault them when they can no longer control their primal, basic sexual urges, assuming these men are lonely and unattached. In any case, it is not up to a presidential candidate to dictate the morals and religious beliefs of the nation. Santorum is the poorest excuse for a presidential candidate I have ever seen, and I am by no means a young man. The fact that he is winning some of these primaries is shocking and gives me pause. Perhaps it's just a reflection of the weakness of the Republican field in general.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#22 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:08 PM EDT

              Life...Liberty...and the pusuit of happiness...If you have a problem with that Prick Santorum...the problem is YOU! I still don't see a presidential candidate worth my vote...now there's a problem!

              • 2 votes
              Reply#23 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:09 PM EDT

              Mr Santorum has not let facts get in the way of a good(for him) story. The whole thing about the Netherlands elders wearing bracelets asking not to be euthanized, the claim that the constitution requires English to be the official language for Puerto Rico to join the union and now this. He seems to decide what he wants the facts to be and then just pretends that is what they are. Must be nice to live in a world where your beliefs are the only facts around.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#24 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:41 PM EDT

              The main problem is the "prudish" attitude that we Americans take towards nudity. The porn industry is a MULTI-billion dollar a year business..The New York Times reported $10 billion. So who is spending all this money on what is so evil and we are ALL against it. American society wants us to be ashamed at our natural animal instincts. Do some people (men & women) take the porn thing too far? I am sure they do, but it is natural and a healthy libido si craved by all. Viagra, & cialis commercials are on day and night, but don't talk about sexuality, I've got 2 words for you STOP IT! not in Macy's front window, but it is not dirty or wrong, just keep it in it's place.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#25 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:53 PM EDT

              Why is it the government's business if someone watches/views/enjoys pornography? I mean as long as it's not kiddie porn - which is offensive on ALL levels - who cares! Aren't there more pressing issues such as unemployment, the economy, immigration...He is clearly delusional and no wonder Pennsylvanians did not re-elect him.

              • 2 votes
              Reply#26 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:57 PM EDT
              Jump to discussion page: 1 2
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.